Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39034329›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2024

Interactions between arm and leg neuronal circuits following paired cervical and lumbosacral transspinal stimulation in healthy humans.

Abdullah M Sayed Ahmad, Andreas Skiadopoulos, Maria Knikou

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07204184 (Cervical and Lumbosacral Transspinal Stimulation to Reconnect the Injured Human Spinal Cord), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07204184 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Cervical and Lumbosacral Transspinal Stimulation to Reconnect the Injured Human Spinal Cord

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaria Knikou, PT, MBA, PhDRan2026 to 2028Enrolled36ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries (Complete and Incomplete)ArmsMultisite transspinal stimulation at rest, Multisite transspinal stimulation during robotic gait training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abdullah M Sayed AhmadKlab4Recovery Research Program (aka Knikou Lab), The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-9387-1021
Andreas SkiadopoulosKlab4Recovery Research Program (aka Knikou Lab), The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5924-569X
Maria KnikouKlab4Recovery Research Program (aka Knikou Lab), The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA. Maria.Knikou@csi.cuny.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6277-236X

Funding

New York State Department of Health C35594GGNew York State Department of Health C38333GG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transspinal (or transcutaneous spinal cord) stimulation is a promising noninvasive method that may strengthen the intrinsic spinal neural connectivity in neurological disorders. In this study we assessed the effects of cervical transspinal stimulation on the amplitude of leg transspinal evoked potentials (TEPs), and the effects of lumbosacral transspinal stimulation on the amplitude of arm TEPs. Control TEPs were recorded following transspinal stimulation with one cathode electrode placed either on Cervical 3 (21.3 ± 1.7 mA) or Thoracic 10 (23.6 ± 16.5 mA) vertebrae levels. Associated anodes were placed bilaterally on clavicles or iliac crests. Cervical transspinal conditioning stimulation produced short latency inhibition of TEPs recorded from left soleus (ranging from - 6.11 to -3.87% of control TEP at C-T intervals of -50, -25, -20, -15, -10, 15 ms), right semitendinosus (ranging from - 11.1 to -4.55% of control TEP at C-T intervals of -20, -15, 15 ms), and right vastus lateralis (ranging from - 13.3 to -8.44% of control TEP at C-T intervals of -20 and - 15 ms) (p < 0.05). Lumbosacral transspinal conditioning stimulation produced no significant effects on arm TEPs. We conclude that in the resting state, cervical transspinal stimulation affects the net motor output of leg motoneurons under the experimental conditions used in this study. Further investigations are warranted to determine whether this protocol may reactivate local spinal circuitry after stroke or spinal cord injury and may have a significant effect in synchronization of upper and lower limb muscle synergies during rhythmic activities like locomotion or cycling.

Indexed as

ArmEvoked Potentials, MotorLegSpinal Cord StimulationAdultCervical VertebraeElectromyographyFemaleHumansLumbosacral RegionMaleMuscle, SkeletalNeural PathwaysYoung AdultArm-leg neuronal couplingTranscutaneous spinal cord stimulationTransspinal stimulation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.