Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39034310›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Refining the optimal CAF cluster marker for predicting TME-dependent survival expectancy and treatment benefits in NSCLC patients.

Kai Li, Rui Wang, Guo-Wei Liu, Zi-Yang Peng, Ji-Chang Wang, Guo-Dong Xiao, Shou-Ching Tang, Ning Du, Jia Zhang, Jing Zhang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Modeling CAF-tumor interactions to overcome therapy resistance.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kai Li *Department of Otorhinolaryngology‑Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Rui Wang *Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, Cancer Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Guo-Wei Liu *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital, Gonghe Road No. 2, Chengdong District, Xining, 810007, Qinghai, China.
Zi-Yang PengSchool of Future Technology, National Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Ji-Chang WangDepartment of Vascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Guo-Dong XiaoOncology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zheng Zhou, 450052, Henan, China.
Shou-Ching TangSection of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, LSUHSC Cancer Center, School of Medicine, 1700 Tulane Avenue, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Ning DuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, Cancer Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Jia ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, Cancer Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Jing ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, Cancer Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Hong RenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, Cancer Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Xin SunDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, Cancer Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Yi-Ping YangDepartment of Radiotherapy, Shaanxi Provincial Tumor Hospital, 309 Yanta W Rd, Yanta District, Xi'an, 710063, Shaanxi, China. yangyiping1029@163.com.
Da-Peng LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, Cancer Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China. prof_ldp_oncology@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a pivotal role in the onset, progression, and treatment response of cancer. Among the various components of the TME, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are key regulators of both immune and non-immune cellular functions. Leveraging single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA) data, we have uncovered previously hidden and promising roles within this specific CAF subgroup, paving the way for its clinical application. However, several critical questions persist, primarily stemming from the heterogeneous nature of CAFs and the use of different fibroblast markers in various sample analyses, causing confusion and hindrance in their clinical implementation. In this groundbreaking study, we have systematically screened multiple databases to identify the most robust marker for distinguishing CAFs in lung cancer, with a particular focus on their potential use in early diagnosis, staging, and treatment response evaluation. Our investigation revealed that COL1A1, COL1A2, FAP, and PDGFRA are effective markers for characterizing CAF subgroups in most lung adenocarcinoma datasets. Through comprehensive analysis of treatment responses, we determined that COL1A1 stands out as the most effective indicator among all CAF markers. COL1A1 not only deciphers the TME signatures related to CAFs but also demonstrates a highly sensitive and specific correlation with treatment responses and multiple survival outcomes. For the first time, we have unveiled the distinct roles played by clusters of CAF markers in differentiating various TME groups. Our findings confirm the sensitive and unique contributions of CAFs to the responses of multiple lung cancer therapies. These insights significantly enhance our understanding of TME functions and drive the translational application of extensive scRNA sequence results. COL1A1 emerges as the most sensitive and specific marker for defining CAF subgroups in scRNA analysis. The CAF ratios represented by COL1A1 can potentially serve as a reliable predictor of treatment responses in clinical practice, thus providing valuable insights into the influential roles of TME components. This research marks a crucial step forward in revolutionizing our approach to cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCancer-Associated FibroblastsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCancer associated fibroblastsMarker selectionscRNA sequence dataTherapy responseTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID39034310
PMCPMC11271481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.