ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2024
Novel Characterization of Socioecological Determinants of Health in Rural Alabama.
Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSocioecological determinants of health (SEDOHs) influence disparities in surgical outcomes. However, SEDOHs are challenging to measure, limiting our ability to address disparities. Using a validated survey (SEDOH-88), we assessed SEDOHs in three rural communities in Alabama. We hypothesized that SEDOHs would vary significantly across sites but measuring them would be acceptable and feasible. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database involving surgical patients who completed the SEDOH-88 and a secondary survey assessing it's acceptability or feasibility from August 2021 to July 2023. Included patients underwent endoscopic, minimally invasive, or open surgery at three rural hospitals: Demopolis (DM), Alexander City (AC), and Greenville (GV).
resultsThe 107 participants comprised 48 (44.9%) from DM, 27 (25.2%) from AC, and 32 (29.9%) from GV, respectively. The median age was 64 y, and 65.6% were female. When comparing DM to AC and GV by individual factors, DM had the largest Black population (78.7 versus 22.2 versus 48.3%, P < 0.001) and more often required help reading hospital materials (20.5 versus 3.7 versus 10.3%, P = 0.007). When comparing DM to AC and GV by structural and environmental factors, DM had more Medicaid enrollees (27.3 versus 3.7 versus 6.9%, P = 0.033) and lacked fresh produce (18.2 versus 25.9 versus 39.3%, P = 0.033) and internet access (63.6 versus 100.0 versus 86.2%, P < 0.001). The SEDOH-88 had an overall 90.9% positive acceptability and feasibility score.
conclusionsSEDOHs varied significantly across rural communities regarding individual (race or health literacy), structural (insurance), and environmental-level factors (nutritious food or internet access). The high acceptability and feasibility of the SEDOH-88 shows it's potential utility in identifying targets for future disparity-reducing interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.