Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39033484›Full record

Observational studyUpdates in surgery2024

Comparison of the 3-D mesh and Sugarbaker repair for parastomal hernia: a single center experience in China.

Hekai Shi, Shaochun Li, Yiming Lin, Dongchao Yang, Wenpei Dong, Zhicheng Song, Heng Song, Yan Gu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06077318 (Comparison of the Sugarbaker and Keyhole Repair for Parastomal Hernia), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06077318 unknown statusnot on this map

Comparison of the Sugarbaker and Keyhole Repair for Parastomal Hernia: 10 Years of Experience From a Single Center in China

TypeobservationalSponsorFudan UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled100ConditionsParastomal HerniaArmsKeyhole repair, Sugarbaker repair
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Outcomes of surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a bayesian network meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hekai Shi *Department of General Surgery, Fudan University Affiliated Huadong Hospital, No. 221, West Yan'an Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200040, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3350-5382
Shaochun Li *Department of General Surgery, Fudan University Affiliated Huadong Hospital, No. 221, West Yan'an Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200040, People's Republic of China.
Yiming LinDepartment of General Surgery, Fudan University Affiliated Huadong Hospital, No. 221, West Yan'an Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200040, People's Republic of China.
Dongchao YangDepartment of General Surgery, Fudan University Affiliated Huadong Hospital, No. 221, West Yan'an Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200040, People's Republic of China.
Wenpei DongDepartment of General Surgery, Fudan University Affiliated Huadong Hospital, No. 221, West Yan'an Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200040, People's Republic of China.
Zhicheng SongDepartment of General Surgery, Fudan University Affiliated Huadong Hospital, No. 221, West Yan'an Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200040, People's Republic of China.
Heng SongDepartment of General Surgery, Fudan University Affiliated Huadong Hospital, No. 221, West Yan'an Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200040, People's Republic of China.
Yan GuDepartment of General Surgery, Fudan University Affiliated Huadong Hospital, No. 221, West Yan'an Road, Jing'an District, Shanghai, 200040, People's Republic of China. yangu@fudan.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81970455National Natural Science Foundation of China 82170526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parastomal hernias (PSH) are difficult to manage and associated with high rates of postoperative recurrence and complications. Sugarbaker and three-dimensional (3-D) mesh repair are commonly used methods for the surgical treatment of PSH. However, the efficacy and safety of these surgical techniques have not been adequately compared. Patients with PSH who received 3-D mesh or Sugarbaker repair at our center from August 2012 to May 2023 were included. We retrospectively analyzed their demographic data and postoperative outcomes. The primary outcome measure was the recurrence rate at 1-year follow-up. A total of 86 patients were enrolled, involving 53 in the 3-D mesh (62%) group and 33 in the Sugarbaker (38%) group. Most cases (73%) involved were the laparoscopic approach. The recurrence rate at 1-year follow-up was 15% (eight cases) in the 3-D mesh group and 24% (eight cases) in the Sugarbaker group, with no statistical significance (P = 0.29). Additionally, no differences were observed between the 3-D mesh and Sugarbaker groups in the length of hospitalization or in short- and long-term complications. Sugarbaker and 3-D mesh repair have similar clinical efficacy in the surgical treatment of PSH. Further randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these results.Trial registration number.This study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06077318).

Indexed as

HerniorrhaphyRecurrenceSurgical MeshAdultAgedChinaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHernia, VentralHumansIncisional HerniaLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesMeshParastomal herniaSugarbakerThree-dimensional

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.