Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39033480›Full record

ReviewJournal of religion and health2024

Quantitative and Qualitative Research in the Field of 'Spirituality and Health': An Introductory How-to-Guide from a Brazilian Perspective.

Giancarlo Lucchetti, Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti, Luciano Magalhães Vitorino, Elena Zuliani Martin, Paulo Othavio de Araujo Almeida, Bianca Besteti Fernandes Damiano, Willyane de Andrade Alvarenga, Rodolfo Furlan Damiano

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of religion and health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Opinions, Attitudes and Beliefs Regarding Spirituality and Religiosity in the Clinical Practice of Dental Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Giancarlo LucchettiSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5384-9476
Alessandra Lamas Granero LucchettiSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1096-1038
Luciano Magalhães VitorinoFaculty of Medicine of Itajuba, Itajubá, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1023-8488
Elena Zuliani MartinSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7871-399X
Paulo Othavio de Araujo AlmeidaSchool of Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4362-6797
Bianca Besteti Fernandes DamianoFaculty of Medicine of São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8639-4746
Willyane de Andrade AlvarengaCentro Universitário Santo Agostinho e Federal University of Piauí, Teresina, Piauí, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6114-8293
Rodolfo Furlan DamianoInstitute of Psychiatry, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. damianorf@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3180-7926

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present article aims to describe the different steps on how to design, develop and conduct quantitative and qualitative Spirituality and Health (S/H) studies from a Brazilian perspective, discussing definitions and instruments, and proposing a "how-to guide" for those interested in this field of research. A narrative review of the literature has been conducted by experts in the field of S/H aiming to develop a "how-to-guide". Spirituality is a very complex concept that has several challenges in the current scientific literature, including the lack of consensus in the definitions, the numerous dimensions assessed, the diverse instruments for measurement, the criticisms from other scholars, the great diversity of religious and cultural traditions and the growing number of "spiritual but not religious" individuals. This review supports that S/H studies may follow the high scientific standards, using consolidated research procedures and solid methods for both qualitative and quantitative research. Some peculiarities of the research methods for this field are discussed. S/H research is still under development, and there are several future directions for S/H studies, aiming to minimize previous criticisms and generating stronger evidence.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchSpiritualityBrazilHumansResearch DesignMedicineReligionResearch methodsSpiritualityStatistics

Identifiers

PMID39033480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.