Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39033479›Full record

ArticlePsychometrika2024

Reliability Theory for Measurements with Variable Test Length, Illustrated with ERN and Pe Collected in the Flanker Task.

Jules L Ellis, Klaas Sijtsma, Kristel de Groot, Patrick J F Groenen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychometrika, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jules L EllisFaculty of Psychology, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands. jules.ellis@ou.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-4429-5475
Klaas SijtsmaTilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4739-0574
Kristel de GrootErasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1123-3056
Patrick J F GroenenErasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6683-8971

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In psychophysiology, an interesting question is how to estimate the reliability of event-related potentials collected by means of the Eriksen Flanker Task or similar tests. A special problem presents itself if the data represent neurological reactions that are associated with some responses (in case of the Flanker Task, responding incorrectly on a trial) but not others (like when providing a correct response), inherently resulting in unequal numbers of observations per subject. The general trend in reliability research here is to use generalizability theory and Bayesian estimation. We show that a new approach based on classical test theory and frequentist estimation can do the job as well and in a simpler way, and even provides additional insight to matters that were unsolved in the generalizability method approach. One of our contributions is the definition of a single, overall reliability coefficient for an entire group of subjects with unequal numbers of observations. Both methods have slightly different objectives. We argue in favor of the classical approach but without rejecting the generalizability approach.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremEvoked PotentialsPsychometricsElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeReproducibility of Resultsclassical test theoryERNevent-related potentialsFlanker TaskPereliability

Identifiers

PMID39033479
PMCPMC11582099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.