Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39033367›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of fertility & sterility2024

An Approach to Improve Endometrial Receptivity: Is It Beneficial to Flush The Uterine Cavity with Follicular Fluid and Granulosa Cells? A Phase III Randomised Clinical Trial.

Elham Hosseini, Samaneh Aghajanpour, Zahra Chekini, Nadia Zameni, Zahra Zolfaghary, Reza Aflatoonian, Maryam Hafezi

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of fertility & sterility, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04077970 (Evaluation of Implantation and Clinical Pregnancy After Intrauterine Flushing of Infertile Patients With Follicular Fluid Plus Granulosa Cells- Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04077970 phase3completednot on this map

Evaluation of Implantation and Clinical Pregnancy After Intrauterine Flushing of Infertile Patients With Follicular Fluid Plus Granulosa Cells- Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRoyan InstituteRan2018 to 2023Enrolled140ConditionsFollicular Fluid, Granulosa Cell, Embryo ImplantationArmsIntrauterine flushing of follicular fluid with granulosa cells
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elham HosseiniZanjan Metabolic Diseases Research Centre, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-3494-6262
Samaneh AghajanpourDepartment of Endocrinology and Female Infertility, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Centre, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-3765-5647
Zahra ChekiniDepartment of Endocrinology and Female Infertility, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Centre, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-6087-5923
Nadia ZameniSchool of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1833-141X
Zahra ZolfagharySchool of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9323-1080
Reza AflatoonianDepartment of Endocrinology and Female Infertility, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Centre, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran. Email: r.aflatoonian@royaninstitute.org.ORCID 0000-0002-8570-583X
Maryam HafeziDepartment of Endocrinology and Female Infertility, Reproductive Biomedicine Research Centre, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran. Email: m.hafezi@royaninstitute.org.ORCID 0000-0001-9978-1473

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe follicular fluid (FF) of mature oocytes contains a high concentration of growth factors and cytokines that have the potential to influence implantation in either a paracrine or autocrine manner. During the physiological processes of ovulation, FF enters the fallopian tubes in conjunction with the oocyte. The purpose of this study is to evaluate implantation and clinical pregnancy rates following uterine flushing with FF and granulosa cells in infertile women with moderate male factor infertility after ovum retrieval for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis phase III randomised clinical trial enrolled 140 women with moderate male factor infertility who intended to undergo ICSI at Royan Infertility Clinic (Tehran, Iran). A computer-generated program and opaque sealed envelopes were used to randomly allocate patients to either an intervention group (n=70) or a control group (n=70). Participants in the intervention group received 2 ml of clear FF (without blood contamination) from 2 to 3 dominant follicles after oocyte retrieval. The control group only underwent uterine cavity catheterisation.

resultsThe intervention group had a clinical pregnancy rate of 38.5% (25/65) compared to the control group [42.9% (27/63); P=0.719] and an implantation rate of 24.1% compared to the control group (27%; P=0.408). These rates did not differ between the groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups in terms of pregnancy-related complications-ectopic pregnancy, blighted ovum or anembryonic pregnancy, and abortion.

conclusionUterine cavity flushing with FF from mature follicles following oocyte retrieval had no effect, either positively or negatively, on clinical pregnancy or implantation rates in women with moderate male factor infertility (registration number: NCT04077970).

Indexed as

Clinical pregnancyEndometrial Receptivityfollicular fluidGranulosa cellimplantation

Identifiers

PMID39033367
PMCPMC11263849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.