Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39033344›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2025

Antibiotic-loaded bone cement is associated with a reduction of the risk of revision of total knee arthroplasty: Analysis of the Catalan Arthroplasty Register.

Sergi Gil-Gonzalez, Borja Velasco-Regúlez, Jesus Cerquides, Pedro Hinarejos, Joan Carles Monllau, Xavier Pelfort

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The application of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in preventing periprosthetic joint infection: an umbrella review.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sergi Gil-GonzalezInstitut d'investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT-CERCA), Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain.
Borja Velasco-RegúlezData and Artificial Intelligence, Agency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4718-3388
Jesus CerquidesLearning systems, Artificial Intelligence Research Institute (IIIA-CSIC), Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3752-644X
Pedro HinarejosDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Parc de Salut Mar, Hospital de la Esperanza, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Joan Carles MonllauDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Parc de Salut Mar, Hospital de la Esperanza, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier PelfortInstitut d'investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT-CERCA), Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sabadell, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to analyse the impact on peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) rate and prosthetic survival using antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) versus plain cement during total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted. The main data source was the Catalan Arthroplasty Register (RACat). TKAs with surgery date between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2020 were analysed and followed up until 31 December 2023. The main variable of interest was the type of cement (ALBC vs. plain cement), and several endpoints (septic revision, aseptic revision, and all-cause revision) were considered. The analysed outcomes were revision rates, survival rates and risk factors' hazard ratios (HR).

resultsA total of 22,781 TKAs were analysed, 13,125 (57.6%) of them with plain cement and 9656 (42.4%) with ALBC. The septic revision rate was lower in the ALBC group after 3 months of follow-up (0.52% vs. 0.78%, p value = 0.04). Prosthetic survival with respect to the aseptic revision endpoint was also higher for the ALBC group during the whole follow-up period (~158 months). Regarding risk factors for infection, ALBC showed a protective effect, HR: 0.53 (0.44, 0.63), while sex (being male) and the analysed comorbidities increased the risk.

conclusionsALBC is associated with a reduction in both the septic revision and the aseptic revision rate after TKA, and thus with higher prosthetic survival. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic, retrospective.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBone CementsProsthesis FailureProsthesis-Related InfectionsRegistriesReoperationAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansKnee ProsthesisMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone Cementsantibiotic‐loaded bone cementperi‐prosthetic joint infectionplain cementtotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID39033344
PMCPMC11716362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.