Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39033262›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2024

Performance and clinical outcomes in telestroke remain robust during the COVID-pandemic: insight into the NEVAS network.

Ilias Masouris, L Kellert, R Müller, L Fuhry, G F Hamann, J M Rémi, F Schöberl

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ilias MasourisDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Ilias.Masouris@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6926-0527
L KellertDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
R MüllerDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Rehabilitation, Bezirkskrankenhaus Guenzburg, Guenzburg, Germany.
L FuhryDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum Ingolstadt, Ingolstadt, Germany.
G F HamannDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Rehabilitation, Bezirkskrankenhaus Guenzburg, Guenzburg, Germany.
J M RémiDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
F SchöberlDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic had significant impact on global healthcare, including stroke management. Telemedical stroke networks have emerged with positive results for patient outcome in rural areas without stroke expertise. However, telestroke faced enormous on-site challenges during the pandemic. So far, data on performance and clinical outcomes in telestroke settings during the COVID-pandemic are scarce.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from stroke patients treated in four spoke hospitals of the Bavarian telestroke network NEVAS in 2020-2021 and 2019 as reference year and compared the 3 years for various parameters. Primary outcome was functional outcome according to the modified Rankin scale (mRS). Secondary outcome parameters included time intervals, periprocedural intracranial hemorrhage rates, and mortality.

resultsIn 2019-2021, 2820 patients were treated for acute ischemic stroke with an admission decrease of 10% during the pandemic. Of those, 241 received only IVT and 204 were transferred to our center for MT. Door-to-imaging, door-to-needle, and symptom-onset-to-groin times remained comparable in the 3 years. Complication rates remained at a low level. Good clinical outcome rates (mRS 0-2) at discharge remained stable for all stroke patients (82-84%) and for those treated with IVT (64-77%). Good clinical outcome rates at 3 month follow-up for MT patients declined in 2020 (23% vs. 35% in 2019) but recovered again in 2021 (42%). Mortality rates did not increase for all patient groups analyzed.

conclusionsStroke care remained robust during the COVID-pandemic within our network, indicating that well-established telestroke networks can overcome unexpected critical challenges such as a pandemic, guaranteeing best practice stroke care in rural areas.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGermanyHumansIschemic StrokeMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesStrokeThrombolytic TherapyTime-to-TreatmentTreatment OutcomeCOVID-pandemicIntravenous thrombolysisStrokeTelemedicine networkThrombectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.