Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39033238›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2024

Estimating the household secondary attack rate and serial interval of COVID-19 using social media.

Aarzoo Dhiman, Elad Yom-Tov, Lorenzo Pellis, Michael Edelstein, Richard Pebody, Andrew Hayward, Thomas House, Thomas Finnie, David Guzman, Vasileios Lampos and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Aarzoo DhimanDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK. aarzoo.dhiman@ucl.ac.uk.
Elad Yom-TovMicrosoft Research, Herzliya, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2380-4584
Lorenzo PellisDepartment of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Michael EdelsteinAzrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel.
Richard PebodyUK Health Security Agency, 61 Collingdate Avenue, NW9 5EQ, London, UK.
Andrew HaywardUCL Collaborative Centre for Inclusion Health, UCL, London, UK.
Thomas HouseDepartment of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5835-8062
Thomas FinnieUK Health Security Agency, 61 Collingdate Avenue, NW9 5EQ, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5962-4211
David GuzmanDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK.
Vasileios LamposDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK. v.lampos@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8555-2063
Virus Watch Consortium
Ingemar J CoxDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK. ingemar@ieee.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6662-417X

Funding

Google N/ARCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) (EP/K031953/1RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/K031953/1RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/R00529X/1RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) MC PC 19070Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose a method to estimate the household secondary attack rate (hSAR) of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom based on activity on the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. Conventional methods of hSAR estimation are resource intensive, requiring regular contact tracing of COVID-19 cases. Our proposed framework provides a complementary method that does not rely on conventional contact tracing or laboratory involvement, including the collection, processing, and analysis of biological samples. We use a text classifier to identify reports of people tweeting about themselves and/or members of their household having COVID-19 infections. A probabilistic analysis is then performed to estimate the hSAR based on the number of self or household, and self and household tweets of COVID-19 infection. The analysis includes adjustments for a reluctance of Twitter users to tweet about household members, and the possibility that the secondary infection was not acquired within the household. Experimental results for the UK, both monthly and weekly, are reported for the period from January 2020 to February 2022. Our results agree with previously reported hSAR estimates, varying with the primary variants of concern, e.g. delta and omicron. The serial interval (SI) is based on the time between the two tweets that indicate a primary and secondary infection. Experimental results, though larger than the consensus, are qualitatively similar. The estimation of hSAR and SI using social media data constitutes a new tool that may help in characterizing, forecasting and managing outbreaks and pandemics in a faster, affordable, and more efficient manner.

Identifiers

PMID39033238
PMCPMC11271293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.