Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39033219›Full record

ReviewAnnals of intensive care2024

Fluid accumulation syndrome in sepsis and septic shock: pathophysiology, relevance and treatment-a comprehensive review.

Carmen Andrea Pfortmueller, Wojciech Dabrowski, Rob Wise, Niels van Regenmortel, Manu L N G Malbrain

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of intensive care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 55 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparison of vasopressin-first weaning versus norepinephrine-first weaning in critically ill patients.International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carmen Andrea PfortmuellerDepartment of Intensive Care, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 10, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. carmen.pfortmueller@insel.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0326-2770
Wojciech DabrowskiFirst Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Rob WiseDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Niels van RegenmortelDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Campus Stuivenberg/Cadix, Antwerp, Belgium.
Manu L N G MalbrainFirst Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1816-5255

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we aimed to comprehensively summarize current literature on pathophysiology, relevance, diagnosis and treatment of fluid accumulation in patients with sepsis/septic shock. Fluid accumulation syndrome (FAS) is defined as fluid accumulation (any degree, expressed as percentage from baseline body weight) with new onset organ-failure. Over the years, many studies have described the negative impact of FAS on clinically relevant outcomes. While the relationship between FAS and ICU outcomes is well described, uncertainty exists regarding its diagnosis, monitoring and treatment. A stepwise approach is suggested to prevent and treat FAS in patients with septic shock, including minimizing fluid intake (e.g., by limiting intravenous fluid administration and employing de-escalation whenever possible), limiting sodium and chloride administration, and maximizing fluid output (e.g., with diuretics, or renal replacement therapy). Current literature implies the need for a multi-tier, multi-modal approach to de-resuscitation, combining a restrictive fluid management regime with a standardized early active de-resuscitation, maintenance fluid reduction (avoiding fluid creep) and potentially using physical measures such as compression stockings.Trial registration: Not applicable.

Indexed as

De-resuscitationFluid accumulationFluidsMonitoringResuscitationSafety

Identifiers

PMID39033219
PMCPMC11264678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.