Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39033180›Full record

ReviewCell death discovery2024

Progression of m

Xuan Han, Yu Zhu, Juan Ke, Yufeng Zhai, Min Huang, Xin Zhang, Hongjie He, Xiaojing Zhang, Xuehong Zhao, Kaikai Guo and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell death discovery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The relevance of mJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Elevated mBMC cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Epitranscriptomics Regulation of CD70, CD80, and TIGIT in Cancer Immunity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Xuan Han *First Clinical College of Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, China.
Yu Zhu *Linfen Central Hospital, Linfen, China.
Juan KeLinfen Central Hospital, Linfen, China.
Yufeng ZhaiLinfen Central Hospital, Linfen, China.
Min HuangLinfen Central Hospital, Linfen, China.
Xin ZhangLinfen Central Hospital, Linfen, China.
Hongjie HeLinfen Central Hospital, Linfen, China.
Xiaojing ZhangLinfen Central Hospital, Linfen, China.
Xuehong ZhaoLinfen Central Hospital, Linfen, China.
Kaikai GuoLinfen Central Hospital, Linfen, China.
Xianglin LiLinfen Central Hospital, Linfen, China.
Zhongyu HanSchool of Medicine and Life Sciences, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Yanming ZhangLinfen Central Hospital, Linfen, China. zym9463@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1480-1756

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, N6-methyladenosine (m

Identifiers

PMID39033180
PMCPMC11271487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.