ArticleNature communications2024
Copy number losses of oncogenes and gains of tumor suppressor genes generate common driver mutations.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- SOPA and SIMPA: normalized single-sample integrated multiomics pathway analysis of tumor heterogeneity in solid cancers.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- The dynamics of mutational selection in cutaneous squamous carcinogenesis.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of quantitative polymerase chain reaction for detecting BRCA1 or BRCA2 copy number loss in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Widespread Epistasis between Cancer Driver Mutations and Allele-Specific Copy Number Variations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Modeling and targeting general and chromosome-specific aneuploidy in cancer.Genes & development · 2025Review
- Review
- Integrative Analysis Reveals the Prognostic Effects of Epigenetic Regulators in Bladder Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- DiffInvex identifies evolutionary shifts in driver gene repertoires during tumorigenesis and chemotherapy.Nature communications · 2025Article
- SpatialSNV: A novel method for identifying and analyzing spatially resolved SNVs in tumor microenvironments.GigaScience · 2025Article
- Copy number losses of oncogenes and gains of tumor suppressor genes generate common driver mutations.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer driver genes can undergo positive selection for various types of genetic alterations, including gain-of-function or loss-of-function mutations and copy number alterations (CNA). We investigated the landscape of different types of alterations affecting driver genes in 17,644 cancer exomes and genomes. We find that oncogenes may simultaneously exhibit signatures of positive selection and also negative selection in different gene segments, suggesting a method to identify additional tumor types where an oncogene is a driver or a vulnerability. Next, we characterize the landscape of CNA-dependent selection effects, revealing a general trend of increased positive selection on oncogene mutations not only upon CNA gains but also upon CNA deletions. Similarly, we observe a positive interaction between mutations and CNA gains in tumor suppressor genes. Thus, two-hit events involving point mutations and CNA are universally observed regardless of the type of CNA and may signal new therapeutic opportunities. An analysis with focus on the somatic CNA two-hit events can help identify additional driver genes relevant to a tumor type. By a global inference of point mutation and CNA selection signatures and interactions thereof across genes and tissues, we identify 9 evolutionary archetypes of driver genes, representing different mechanisms of (in)activation by genetic alterations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.