Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39033114›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2024

Healthcare professionals' perceptions of challenges in vaccine communication and training needs: a qualitative study.

Dawn Holford, Emma C Anderson, Aishmita Biswas, Amanda Garrison, Harriet Fisher, Emeline Brosset, Virginia C Gould, Pierre Verger, Stephan Lewandowsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dawn HolfordSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, 12A Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TU, United Kingdom. dawn.holford@bristol.ac.uk.
Emma C AndersonBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Aishmita BiswasSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, 12A Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TU, United Kingdom.
Amanda GarrisonFaculté Des Sciences Médicales Et Paramédicales, Southeastern Health Regional Observatory (Observatoire Régional de La Santé, ORS) PACA, Marseille, France.
Harriet FisherBristol Medical School, National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Behavioural Science and Evaluation (BSE) University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Emeline BrossetFaculté Des Sciences Médicales Et Paramédicales, Southeastern Health Regional Observatory (Observatoire Régional de La Santé, ORS) PACA, Marseille, France.
Virginia C GouldSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, 12A Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TU, United Kingdom.
Pierre VergerFaculté Des Sciences Médicales Et Paramédicales, Southeastern Health Regional Observatory (Observatoire Régional de La Santé, ORS) PACA, Marseille, France.
Stephan LewandowskySchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, 12A Priory Road, Bristol, BS8 1TU, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare professionals (HCPs) can play an important role in encouraging patients and their caregivers to be vaccinated. The objective of this qualitative study was to investigate HCPs' perspectives on challenges in vaccine communication and unmet training needs in this domain.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 41 HCPs (mainly nurses and physicians) with vaccination roles (23 in England; 18 in France), gathering information on: (1) HCPs' approach to vaccine conversations with patients; (2) Challenges of communicating about vaccines; (3) Vaccine-related training and learning resources available to HCPs, and; (4) HCPs' training needs around vaccine communication.

resultsHCPs described a range of communication experiences that indicated insufficient time, information, and skills to confidently navigate difficult conversations with vaccine-hesitant patients. Communication skills were especially important to avoid conflict that could potentially damage the patient-provider relationship. Some HCPs interviewed had received communication training, but for most, this training was not specific to vaccination. Although general communication skills were transferable to vaccine conversations, most HCPs welcomed specific training and informational resources to support countering patients' misconceptions or misinformation about vaccines.

conclusionsHCPs would benefit from training tailored to address vaccine communication with patients, and this should be part of a systemic approach that also provides time and space to have effective vaccine conversations.

Indexed as

CommunicationHealth PersonnelQualitative ResearchAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelEnglandFemaleFranceHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedProfessional-Patient RelationsVaccinationVaccination HesitancyVaccinesVaccinesHealthcare professionalsSkills trainingVaccine communicationVaccine confidenceVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID39033114
PMCPMC11265004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.