Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39033013›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of ophthalmology2025

Impact of residual retinal fluid on treatment outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Dinah Zur, Robyn Guymer, Jean-François Korobelnik, Lihteh Wu, Francesco Viola, Nicole Eter, Stéphanie Baillif, Youxin Chen, Jennifer J Arnold

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dinah ZurFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Ophthalmology Division, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel dinahzur@gmail.com dinagz@tlvmc.gov.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1147-444X
Robyn GuymerRoyal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, University of Melbourne, Centre for Eye Research Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jean-François KorobelnikService d'ophtalmologie, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4438-9535
Lihteh WuMacula, Vitreous and Retina Associates of Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Francesco ViolaDepartment of Clinical Science and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1208-913X
Nicole EterDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Münster Medical Center, Münster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5617-346X
Stéphanie BaillifDepartment of Ophthalmology, Pasteur 2 Hospital, Nice Cote d'Azur University, Nice, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1700-8570
Youxin ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jennifer J ArnoldMarsden Eye Specialists, Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment decisions for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in the setting of individualised treatment regimens are adapted to disease activity. The main marker of disease activity and trigger for re-treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents is the presence of retinal fluid on optical coherence tomography (OCT). Recently, attention has focused on the impact of residual retinal fluid on nAMD management. Based on a literature review and the combined clinical experience of an international group of retinal specialists, this manuscript provides expert guidance on the treatment of nAMD according to fluid status and proposes an algorithm for determining when to administer anti-VEGF treatment according to residual fluid status. We explore the role of residual fluid in treatment decisions and outcomes in nAMD, taking into consideration fluid evaluation and, in particular, distinguishing between fluid in different anatomic compartments and at different stages during the treatment course. Current limitations to identifying and interpreting fluid on OCT, and the assumption that any residual retinal fluid reflects ongoing VEGF activity, are discussed.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsSubretinal FluidWet Macular DegenerationFluorescein AngiographyHumansIntravitreal InjectionsTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVisual AcuityAngiogenesis InhibitorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, humanAge-Related Macular DegenerationIntraretinal FluidNeovascularisationSubretinal FluidVascular Endothelial Growth Factor

Identifiers

PMID39033013
PMCPMC11866303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.