ArticleKidney international2024
Acute kidney injury genetic risks: taking it 1 SNP at a time.
Article in Kidney international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This commentary addresses some of the strengths, shortcomings, and challenges of the genome-wide association study of acute kidney injury (AKI) report in this issue. This AKI genome-wide association study is well executed and provides significant progress in finding 2 genome-wide significant loci. However, significant interpretive challenges remain, where advancements in methods are needed because of the clinical heterogeneity of the AKI phenotype, plus possible bias due to genetic correlation between index hospitalization risk and AKI risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39032964What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.