Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39032927›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Effectiveness of an institution-based adapted physical activity programme versus a home-based self-management programme for chronic poststroke adults: protocol for a randomised controlled study.

Etienne Satger, Nicolas Prieur-Blanc, Jean-Michel Viton, Pascal Auquier, Laurent Bensoussan, Maëva Cotinat

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06061770 (Comparison of the Effectiveness of an Adapted Physical Activity Program in a Dedicated Structure to a Self-program in Patients in Chronic Phase of a Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06061770 narecruitingnot on this map

Comparison of the Effectiveness of an Adapted Physical Activity Program in a Dedicated Structure to a Self-program in Patients in Chronic Phase of a Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique Hopitaux De MarseilleRan2024 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsStrokeArmsAdapted physical activity program, Adapted physical activity self-program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Etienne SatgerAix Marseille Univ, AP-HM, Hopitaux sud, Physical Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Marseille, France.
Nicolas Prieur-BlancAix Marseille Univ, AP-HM, Hopitaux sud, Physical Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Marseille, France.
Jean-Michel VitonAix-Marseille Univ, APHM, INT, P3M, Hopitaux Sud, Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Marseille, France.
Pascal AuquierEA 3279 (Santé Publique : Qualité de Vie et Maladies Chroniques), Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Laurent BensoussanAix-Marseille Univ, APHM, INT, P3M, Hopitaux Sud, Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Marseille, France.
Maëva CotinatAix Marseille Univ, AP-HM, Hopitaux sud, Physical Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Marseille, France maeva.cotinat@ap-hm.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-2500-1224

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPhysical activity (PA) protects the cardiovascular system and reduces the risk of stroke recurrence. However, most stroke survivors have significantly lower daily PA levels than those recommended. Adapted PA programmes provide a useful means of increasing the daily PA levels of this population. PA programmes designed to encourage people walking have been found to be more effective than no intervention. Some programmes have been applied in institutional settings while others are done on an independent basis. The aim of this study will be to compare the two methods in terms of their impact on the daily walking rates of subjects with spastic hemiparesis following a chronic stroke. Secondary outcomes will include effects on walking ability, endurance, balance, quality of life and motivation for exercise. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This French single-centre randomised (1:1), controlled, two-arm, parallel, single-blind study will include 40 adults with chronic stroke spastic hemiparesis who are able to walk for 6 min. The primary outcome will be the participants' daily activity measured via the number of steps performed per day using a Stepwatch device. We expect to establish that the institution-based programme will be more effective than a self-managed programme as a means of increasing the PA of chronic stroke subjects. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by an independent National Ethics Committee (Comité de Protection des personnes Est IV). Participants will be asked to provide their signed informed consent prior to the study. The results will be disseminated via publications in the scientific literature, oral and poster presentations by partners at international scientific meetings and associations of patients.

trial registrationNCT06061770.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapySelf-ManagementStroke RehabilitationAdultChronic DiseaseExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodStrokeWalkingGaitREHABILITATION MEDICINEStrokeStroke medicine

Identifiers

PMID39032927
PMCPMC11261681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.