Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39032845›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2024

Revisiting adolescence as a sensitive period for sociocultural processing.

Theresa W Cheng, Kathryn L Mills, Jennifer H Pfeifer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neural and psychological predictors of digital status-seeking in adolescence.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Social working memory in adolescence.Child development · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Theresa W ChengDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, 1227 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1227, USA; Department of Psychology, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. Electronic address: tcheng@fas.harvard.edu.
Kathryn L MillsDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, 1227 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1227, USA. Electronic address: klmills@uoregon.edu.
Jennifer H PfeiferDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, 1227 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1227, USA. Electronic address: jpfeifer@uoregon.edu.

Funding

A prospective longitudinal study of transactional associations between social, neural, and hormonal changes and adolescent girls' mental health trajectoriesR01MH127408 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI Jennifer Hope Pfeifer · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
Puberty, neural systems for social processes, and early adolescent mental health: A longitudinal neuroimaging studyR01MH107418 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI PFEIFER, JENNIFER HOPE · 2015 to 2019
$3.0M
Social connection and mental health in girls: A prospective longitudinal study across adolescenceR56MH107418 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI PFEIFER, JENNIFER HOPE · 2021 to 2021
$728k
Close friendship quality and the emergence of depression in adolescent females: Neurodevelopmental mechanisms and sensitive periodsF31MH124353 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI CHENG, THERESA W · 2020 to 2021
$44k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH124353NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107418NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH127408NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH107418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waves of research and public discourse have characterized adolescence as periods of developmental risk and opportunity. Underlying this discussion is the recognition that adolescence is a period of major biological and social transition when experience may have an outsized effect on development. This article updates and expands upon prior work suggesting that adolescence may be a sensitive period for sociocultural processing specifically. By integrating evidence from developmental psychology and neuroscience, we identify how trajectories of social and neurobiological development may relate to adolescents' ability to adapt to and learn from their social environments. However, we also highlight gaps in the literature, including challenges in attributing developmental change to adolescent experiences. We discuss the importance of better understanding variability in biology (e.g., pubertal development) and cultural environments, as well as distinguishing between sensitive periods and periods of heightened sensitivity. Finally, we look toward future directions and translational implications of this research.

Indexed as

Adolescent DevelopmentAdolescentBrainHumansSocial BehaviorSocial EnvironmentAdolescenceNeurodevelopmentPlasticityPubertyRisk-takingSensitive periodsSocial cognitionSocial relationshipsSociocultural development

Identifiers

PMID39032845
PMCPMC11407824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.