SynthesisJournal of pain and symptom management2024
Dignity in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A qualitative study exploring youth's experiences of hospital- and integrated community-based mental health services: the YouthCan IMPACT initiative.BMC psychiatry · 2025Trial
- When the Child Is Not Heard: Children's Rights and Epistemic Injustice in Paediatric Nursing Practice.Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals · 2026Article
- Digital storytelling as a memory-making intervention for children and families in paediatric palliative care in Ireland: an adaptation study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextChildren are a uniquely vulnerable patient population with restricted abilities for self-advocacy and autonomy, risking infringement upon their dignity. Yet the concept of dignity in pediatrics remains underexplored relative to the adult literature and other outcome measures.
objectivesTo characterize how dignity is defined, evaluated, and/or measured in pediatrics.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines across the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, PsycINFO, Global Health, Social Science Premium Collection, and Dissertation and Theses. We included publications from database inception through April 2023, in English, involving children aged 0-18 years, and prioritizing dignity as a central theme with a focus on defining, evaluating, or measuring dignity. Study descriptions and pertinent characteristics were extracted and synthesized using a predefined form.
resultsForty-four articles met inclusion criteria; fewer than half comprised original research (20/44, 45%). Most studies (38/44, 86%) included description of the meaning of dignity, with emergence of salient themes around respect, communication, agency/autonomy, and privacy. Less than half (19/44, 43%) included a measurement or evaluation of dignity; approximately one-third described dignity therapy. More than one-third of publications focused on dignity at end of life (17/44, 39%) and included discussions of palliative medicine and hospice (15/44, 34%).
conclusionRelatively few published studies describe dignity in pediatrics. Opportunities exist to broaden scholarship on this topic in partnership with patients, families, and clinicians, with the goal of assessing and strengthening dignity-centered care across the illness course and at the end of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.