Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39032269›Full record

ArticleThe International journal on drug policy2024

A content analysis of cannabis edibles package marketing in the United States.

Beth A Reboussin, Allison J Lazard, Jennifer Cornacchione Ross, Erin L Sutfin, E Alfonso Romero-Sandoval, Cynthia K Suerken, Shelby Lake, Olivia E Horton, Alexandra R Zizzi, Emily Wagoner and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal on drug policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Gimmie the Gummies: Initial validation of the Edibles Marijuana Purchase Task.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A Thematic Text Analysis of Cannabis Edibles Brand Names.Cannabis and cannabinoid research · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Beth A ReboussinWake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, United States. Electronic address: brebouss@wakehealth.edu.
Allison J LazardUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Hussman School of Journalism and Media, 384 Carroll Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.
Jennifer Cornacchione RossBoston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St., Boston, MA 02118, United States.
Erin L SutfinWake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, United States.
E Alfonso Romero-SandovalWake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, United States.
Cynthia K SuerkenWake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, United States.
Shelby LakeUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Hussman School of Journalism and Media, 384 Carroll Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.
Olivia E HortonWake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, United States.
Alexandra R ZizziWake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, United States.
Emily WagonerNorth Carolina State University Poole College of Management, 2801 Founders Dr., Raleigh, NC 27695, United States.
Alondra JanicekWake Forest University College of Arts and Sciences, 104 Reynolda Hall, PO Box 7225, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, United States.
Madeleine BoucherWake Forest University College of Arts and Sciences, 104 Reynolda Hall, PO Box 7225, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, United States.
Kimberly G WagonerWake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, United States.

Funding

The Impact of Product Packaging on Appeal, Knowledge and Risk Perceptions of Cannabis EdiblesR01DA053209 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BETH A. REBOUSSIN · 2022 to 2026
$2.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA053209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith states legalizing cannabis at a rapid pace, and the increasing popularity of edibles, it is important to document marketing practices to better understand how they might be appealing and misleading to consumers to guide state policymakers.

methodsA descriptive content analysis of 1229 cannabis edible packages advertised on a publicly available website between June and November 2022 and available for sale in licensed dispensaries was performed.

resultsHealthy ingredient descriptors were the most common type of descriptor with 31 % of packages including words like "vegan", "gluten free" and "natural". Quality descriptors like "handcrafted" were on 28 % of packages. Other descriptors were focused on the consumer experience including expected effects (e.g., "relax") (27 %), taste or flavor (e.g., "sour") (21 %) and pharmacokinetics (e.g., "fast-acting") (19 %). Images of non-cannabis plants and outdoor nature settings were on half of packages. Images of the cannabis plant were on 33 % of packages. Flavor imagery including images of food were common (43 %). Other marketing appeals included images of people (15 %), animals (12 %) and space (10 %).

conclusionsPackage marketing used by other commercial industries was common on cannabis edible packages. Edibles marketing is distinct from other cannabis products in its ability to focus on the food ingredients which could mislead consumers into thinking the cannabis, rather than the food, is healthy or less harmful. Research examining the impact of cannabis edibles marketing strategies on appeal and harm perceptions is critically needed to guide policymakers as they establish packaging regulations to optimize public health and safety.

Indexed as

CannabisMarketingHumansUnited StatesCannabisEdiblesMarijuanaMarketingPackagingPolicy

Identifiers

PMID39032269
PMCPMC11348886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.