Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39032204›Full record

ArticleHealth & place2024

Situations and roles of cannabis versus cigarette use: Integrating ecological momentary assessment with qualitative mapping interviews.

Julia McQuoid, Timothy Regan, Janardan Devkota, Marshall K Cheney, Vaishnavi Kumar, Julia Oehlers, Kekoa Lopez-Paguyo, Nhung Nguyen, Meredith C Meacham, Pamela M Ling and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health & place, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Julia McQuoidTSET Health Promotion Research Center, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Timothy ReganDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Janardan DevkotaDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Marshall K CheneyDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
Vaishnavi KumarDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
Julia OehlersDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA; John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Kekoa Lopez-PaguyoCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Nhung NguyenCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Meredith C MeachamDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Pamela M LingCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Johannes ThrulDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA; Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: jthrul@jhu.edu.

Funding

Tissue Pathology Shared ResourceP30CA225520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI ROBERT S. MANNEL · 2018 to 2026
$27.1M
NIDA Epidemiology Training Program: Johns Hopkins UniversityT32DA007292 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RENEE M. JOHNSON, Brion S Maher · 1993 to 2026
$17.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA225520NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of both cannabis and tobacco has surpassed use of tobacco alone among young adults in California. To better understand why, we collected data with 32 young adults ages 18-30 in Northern California who regularly used cigarettes and cannabis and had diverse sexual, gender, racial, and ethnic identities. Geographically-explicit ecological momentary assessment (EMA; 30 days) was integrated with qualitative mapping interviews. We found contrasting situations of use for cannabis (e.g., around other people) versus cigarettes (e.g., recent discrimination) and different reasons for why participants chose one substance over the other (e.g., enhancing experiences vs. stepping away). Understanding when and why diverse young adults choose cannabis versus cigarettes as they navigate everyday environments helps explain how cannabis and tobacco retail markets shape substance use disparities over time.

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchAdolescentAdultCaliforniaCigarette SmokingFemaleHumansMaleMarijuana SmokingTobacco ProductsYoung AdultCannabisEcological momentary assessmentMixed methodsTobaccoYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID39032204
PMCPMC11441716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.