Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39031801›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2024

Development of a scale examining post-disaster coping motivations in Turkey after the 6 February earthquake.

Yahya Şahi N, Nesrullah Okan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yahya Şahi NDepartment of Educational Sciences, Guidance and Psychological Counseling, Fırat University, Elaziğ, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0647-4605
Nesrullah OkanDepartment of Educational Sciences, Guidance and Psychological Counseling, Fırat University, Elaziğ, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9496-6417

Funding

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to develop the Motivations for Coping After Disaster Scale. To test the construct validity of the scale, a total of 676 data were collected from three different sampling groups (N1: 388; N2: 194; N3: 94).

methodsExploratory Factor Analysis, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Criterion validity analysis were conducted to test the construct validity of the scale.

resultsAs a result of CFA, it was seen that the post-disaster scale had a five-dimensional structure (spiritual values, hope, friend support, solidarity, family support). The loadings of the items of the scale are at a good level. As a result of CFA, the scale was found to have acceptable and good fit indices (χ

conclusionsThe results of this study show that the Post-Disaster Coping Motivations Scale is a valid and reliable instrument. It is thought that the scale can make an important contribution to understanding psychological recovery processes after disaster and providing appropriate support to individuals.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalEarthquakesMotivationPsychometricsAdolescentAdultAgedDisastersFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSocial SupportTurkeycopingdisasterscale development

Identifiers

PMID39031801
PMCPMC11190024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.