Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39031594›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2024

Differential Conservation and Loss of Chicken Repeat 1 (CR1) Retrotransposons in Squamates Reveal Lineage-Specific Genome Dynamics Across Reptiles.

Simone M Gable, Nicholas A Bushroe, Jasmine M Mendez, Adam Wilson, Brendan J Pinto, Tony Gamble, Marc Tollis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simone M GableSchool of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6656-4034
Nicholas A BushroeSchool of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Jasmine M MendezSchool of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Adam WilsonSchool of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Brendan J PintoCenter for Evolution and Medicine, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4243-5788
Tony GambleDepartment of Zoology, Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0204-8003
Marc TollisSchool of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1917-2473

Funding

The Role of the Microbiome in Cancer Suppression and Susceptibility Across SpeciesU54CA217376 · NCI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI MALEY, CARLO, SHIBATA, DARRYL K · 2018 to 2022
$8.6M
National Science Foundation DEB 2323124NCI NIH HHS U54 CA217376NIH HHS U54 CA217376State of Arizona Technology Research Initiative Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transposable elements (TEs) are repetitive DNA sequences which create mutations and generate genetic diversity across the tree of life. In amniote vertebrates, TEs have been mainly studied in mammals and birds, whose genomes generally display low TE diversity. Squamates (Order Squamata; including ∼11,000 extant species of lizards and snakes) show as much variation in TE abundance and activity as they do in species and phenotypes. Despite this high TE activity, squamate genomes are remarkably uniform in size. We hypothesize that novel, lineage-specific genome dynamics have evolved over the course of squamate evolution. To understand the interplay between TEs and host genomes, we analyzed the evolutionary history of the chicken repeat 1 (CR1) retrotransposon, a TE family found in most tetrapod genomes which is the dominant TE in most reptiles. We compared 113 squamate genomes to the genomes of turtles, crocodilians, and birds and used ancestral state reconstruction to identify shifts in the rate of CR1 copy number evolution across reptiles. We analyzed the repeat landscapes of CR1 in squamate genomes and determined that shifts in the rate of CR1 copy number evolution are associated with lineage-specific variation in CR1 activity. We then used phylogenetic reconstruction of CR1 subfamilies across amniotes to reveal both recent and ancient CR1 subclades across the squamate tree of life. The patterns of CR1 evolution in squamates contrast other amniotes, suggesting key differences in how TEs interact with different host genomes and at different points across evolutionary history.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomeReptilesRetroelementsAnimalsChickensLizardsPhylogenyRetroelementsreptilesretrotransposonssquamatestransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID39031594
PMCPMC11303007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.