Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39031560›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2024

Real-world outcomes of patients with resected stage III melanoma treated with adjuvant therapies.

Danai Dima, Nerea Lopetegui-Lia, Olisaemeka Ogbue, Bennett Osantowski, Fauzia Ullah, Xuefei Jia, Jung Min Song, Brian Gastman, James Isaacs, Lucy Boyce Kennedy and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Retreatment and rechallenge with BRAF/MEK inhibitors in patients with metastatic melanoma: results from the real-world Spanish Melanoma Registry (GEM-1801).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Danai DimaDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3587-7975
Nerea Lopetegui-LiaDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Olisaemeka OgbueDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Bennett OsantowskiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Fauzia UllahDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Xuefei JiaDepartment of Biostatistics, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Jung Min SongDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Brian GastmanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
James IsaacsDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Lucy Boyce KennedyDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Pauline FunchainDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBoth immunotherapy (IO) and targeted therapy (TT) are used as adjuvant (adj) treatment for stage III melanoma, however, data describing real-world outcomes are limited. In addition, a significant proportion of patients relapse, for whom best management is unclear. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy, and safety of adj anti-PD1 IO and TT in a real-world cohort of patients with resected stage III melanoma, and further delineate patterns of recurrence and treatment strategies.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 130 patients who received adj therapy (100 anti-PD1 IO and 30 TT).

resultsAt a median follow-up of 30 months, median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 24.6 (95% CI, 17-not reached [NR]) versus 64 (95% CI, 29.5-NR) months for the TT and IO groups, respectively (p = 0.26). Median overall survival (OS) was NR for either subgroup. At data cutoff, 77% and 82% of patients in TT and IO arms were alive. A higher number of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were noted in the IO group (11% vs. 3%), however, a higher proportion of patients permanently discontinued adj therapy in the TT group (43% vs. 11%) due to toxicity. Strategies at relapse and outcomes were variable based on location and timing of recurrence. A significant number of patients who relapsed after adj IO received a second round of IO. Among them, patients who were off adj IO at relapse had superior second median RFS (mRFS2), compared to those who relapsed while on adj IO; mRFS2 was NR versus 5.1 months (95% CI, 2.5-NR), respectively, p = 0.02.

conclusionIn summary, both TT and IO yielded prolonged RFS in a real-world setting, however, longer follow-up is needed to determine any potential OS benefit. Adj therapy, particularly TT, may not be as well tolerated as suggested in clinical trials, with lower completion rates (59% vs. 74%) in a real-life setting. Overall, patients who relapse during adj therapy have poor outcomes, while patients who relapse after discontinuation of adj IO therapy appear to benefit from IO re-treatment.

Indexed as

MelanomaNeoplasm StagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesSkin NeoplasmsImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsadjuvant therapyadverse eventsimmunotherapystage III melanomatargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID39031560
PMCPMC11190025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.