Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39031516›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2024

Brainstem neuronal responses to transcutaneous auricular and cervical vagus nerve stimulation in rats.

Misty M Owens, Vincent Jacquemet, Vitaly Napadow, Nicole Lewis, Eric Beaumont

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Misty M OwensDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.
Vincent JacquemetDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8485-8738
Vitaly NapadowDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Nicole LewisDepartment of Medical Education, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.
Eric BeaumontDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2907-7768

Funding

Sex Differences in Major Depression, Part II: Impact of Prenatal Immune, Autonomic and Neurovascular FunctionU54MH118919 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Gabriela Apiou · 2020 to 2026
$12.7M
Afferent Mechanisms of Vagal Neuromodulation TherapyR01HL141560 · NHLBI · EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Eric Beaumont · 2018 to 2026
$4.5M
Mapping the linkage between auricular vagus nerve receptors and cardiovagal modulationOT2OD023867 · OD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI NAPADOW, VITALY · 2016 to 2021
$3.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141560NIH HHS OT2 OD023867NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH118919
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) targets subcutaneous axons in the auricular branch of the vagus nerve at the outer ear. Its non-invasive nature makes it a potential treatment for various disorders. taVNS induces neuromodulatory effects within the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS), and due to its widespread connectivity, the NTS acts as a gateway to elicit neuromodulation in both higher-order brain regions and other brainstem nuclei (e.g. spinal trigeminal nucleus; Sp5). Our objective was to examine stimulation parameters on single-neuron electrophysiological responses in α-chloralose-anaesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats within NTS and Sp5. taVNS was also compared to traditional cervical VNS (cVNS) on single neuronal activation. Specifically, electrophysiological extracellular recordings were evaluated for a range of frequency and intensity parameters (20-250 Hz, 0.5-1.0 mA). Neurons were classified as positive, negative or non-responders based on increased activity, decreased activity or no response during stimulation, respectively. Frequency-dependent analysis showed that 20 and 100 Hz generated the highest proportion of positive responders in NTS and Sp5 with 1.0 mA intensities eliciting the greatest magnitude of response. Comparisons between taVNS and cVNS revealed similar parameter-specific activation for caudal NTS neuronal populations; however, individual neurons showed different activation profiles. The latter suggests that cVNS and taVNS send afferent input to NTS via different neuronal pathways. This study demonstrates differential parameter-specific taVNS responses and begins an investigation of the mechanisms responsible for taVNS modulation. Understanding the neuronal pathways responsible for eliciting neuromodulatory effects will enable more tailored taVNS treatments in various clinical disorders. KEY POINTS: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) offers a non-invasive alternative to invasive cervical vagus nerve stimulation (cVNS) by activating vagal afferents in the ear to induce neuromodulation. Our study evaluated taVNS effects on neuronal firing patterns in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) and spinal trigeminal nucleus (Sp5) and found that 20 and 100 Hz notably increased neuronal activity during stimulation in both nuclei. Increasing taVNS intensity not only increased the number of neurons responding in Sp5 but also increased the magnitude of response, suggesting a heightened sensitivity to taVNS compared to NTS. Comparisons between cVNS and taVNS revealed similar overall activation but different responses on individual neurons, indicating distinct neural pathways. These results show parameter-specific and nuclei-specific responses to taVNS and confirm that taVNS can elicit responses comparable to cVNS at the neuronal level, but it does so through different neuronal pathways.

Indexed as

Brain StemNeuronsRats, Sprague-DawleySolitary NucleusTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationVagus Nerve StimulationAnimalsMaleRatsVagus Nervecervical vagus nerve stimulationnucleus of the solitary tractspinal trigeminal nucleustranscutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39031516
PMCPMC11326965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.