ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2024
Utility of genome sequencing in exome-negative pediatric patients with neurodevelopmental phenotypes.
Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of a novel inherited splice-site variant inBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Rigorous genetic diagnosis review in natural history studies.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Modeling the long-range effect of an inversion downstream of EFNB1 concludes a 43-year molecular diagnostic odyssey for craniofrontonasal syndrome.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- Ending diagnostic odyssey by reanalysis of whole exome sequencing data: reclassification of suspected Fanconi anemia cases to dyskeratosis congenita and Diamond-Blackfan anemia.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Establishment and validation of a phenotype-driven predictive model for the diagnostic efficacy of trio-based whole exome sequencing (trio-WES) in children with genetic neurodevelopmental disorders (g-NDDs).Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exome sequencing (ES) has emerged as an essential tool in the evaluation of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) of unknown etiology. Genome sequencing (GS) offers advantages over ES due to improved detection of structural, copy number, repeat number and non-coding variants. However, GS is less commonly utilized due to higher cost and more intense analysis. Here, we present nine cases of pediatric NDD that were molecularly diagnosed with GS between 2017 and 2022, following non-diagnostic ES. All individuals presented with global developmental delay or regression. Other features present in our cohort included epilepsy, white matter abnormalities, brain malformation and dysmorphic features. Two cases were diagnosed on GS due to newly described gene-disease relationship or variant reclassification (MAPK8IP3, CHD3). Additional features missed on ES that were later detected on GS were: intermediate-size deletions in three cases who underwent ES that were not validated for CNV detection, pathogenic variants within the non-protein coding genes SNORD118 and RNU7-1, pathogenic variant within the promoter region of GJB1, and a coding pathogenic variant within BCAP31 which was not sufficiently covered on ES. GS following non-diagnostic ES led to the identification of pathogenic variants in this cohort of nine cases, four of which would not have been identified by reanalysis alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.