Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39031379›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuromuscular diseases2024

The Dutch Dystrophinopathy Database: A National Registry with Standardized Patient and Clinician Reported Real-World Data.

N M van de Velde, Y D Krom, J Bongers, R J A Hoek, N A Ikelaar, M van der Holst, K J Naarding, J C van den Bergen, E Vroom, A Horemans and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

N M van de VeldeDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Y D KromDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J BongersDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
R J A HoekDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
N A IkelaarDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
M van der HolstDuchenne Center Netherlands, Leiden, The Netherlands.
K J NaardingDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J C van den BergenDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
E VroomDuchenne Parent Project, Veenendaal, The Netherlands.
A HoremansSpierziekten Nederland, Baarn, The Netherlands.
J G M HendriksenDuchenne Center Netherlands, Leiden, The Netherlands.
I J M de GrootDuchenne Center Netherlands, Leiden, The Netherlands.
S L S Houwen-van OpstalDuchenne Center Netherlands, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J J G M VerschuurenDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
H A van DuyvenvoordeDuchenne Center Netherlands, Leiden, The Netherlands.
R R SnijderLUMC Biobank Organization, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
E H NiksDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy lack curative treatments. Registers can facilitate therapy development, serving as a platform to study epidemiology, assess clinical trial feasibility, identify eligible candidates, collect real-world data, perform post-market surveillance, and collaborate in (inter)national data-driven initiatives. Objective: In addressing these facets, it's crucial to gather high-quality, interchangeable, and reusable data from a representative population. We introduce the Dutch Dystrophinopathy Database (DDD), a national registry for patients with DMD or BMD, and females with pathogenic DMD variants, outlining its design, governance, and use. Methods: The design of DDD is based on a system-independent information model that ensures interoperable and reusable data adhering to international standards. To maximize enrollment, patients can provide consent online and participation is allowed on different levels with contact details and clinical diagnosis as minimal requirement. Participants can opt-in for yearly online questionnaires on disease milestones and medication and to have clinical data stored from visits to one of the national reference centers. Governance involves a general board, advisory board and database management. Results: On November 1, 2023, 742 participants were enrolled. Self-reported data were provided by 291 Duchenne, 122 Becker and 38 female participants. 96% of the participants visiting reference centers consented to store clinical data. Eligible patients were informed about clinical studies through DDD, and multiple data requests have been approved to use coded clinical data for quality control, epidemiology and natural history studies. Conclusion: The Dutch Dystrophinopathy Database captures long-term patient and high-quality standardized clinician reported healthcare data, supporting trial readiness, post-marketing surveillance, and effective data use using a multicenter design that is scalable to other neuromuscular disorders.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneRegistriesAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsYoung AdultBecker muscular dystrophyDuchenne muscular dystrophyFAIRreal-world dataregistrytrial readiness

Identifiers

PMID39031379
PMCPMC11380288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.