Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39031354›Full record

Trial reportJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2024

Effect of Multimodal Intervention in Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Clinical Trial in Shanghai.

Meixiang Fan, Qingfeng Li, Tingting Yang, Yinghua Yang, Zhihua Chen, Guo Xuan, Ye Ruan, Shuangyuan Sun, Meng Wang, Xiaoli Chen and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of Multi-Modal Training in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Meixiang FanDepartment of General Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qingfeng LiShanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Tingting YangShanghai Center for Clinical Laboratory, Shanghai, China.
Yinghua YangShanghai Center for Clinical Laboratory, Shanghai, China.
Zhihua ChenMedicine-Mental Health Center of Minhang District, Shanghai, China.
Guo XuanMedicine-Mental Health Center of Minhang District, Shanghai, China.
Ye RuanShanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China.
Shuangyuan SunShanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China.
Meng WangSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoli ChenSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yanyan HuangDepartment of General Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhi YangShanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Institute of Psychological and Behavioural Science, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Ying WangSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Previous trials have indicated that multimodal training could improve cognitive functions and moods in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, evidence was mainly obtained from studies in high-income countries. Objective: This trial aims to investigate the efficacy, safety, and potential mechanism of a multimodal intervention on cognitive function in individuals with MCI living in a community. Methods: In this single-blind, randomized controlled trial, 120 participants with MCI were randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group. The intervention group received the multimodal intervention, while the control group received regular health education. Neuropsychological tests and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were conducted at baseline and after the 12-week intervention. Results: Fifty-nine and fifty-seven participants respectively in the intervention and control groups completed the trial. The intervention group shown improvements in primary outcome, Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) total score (mean difference -0.96, 95% CI [-1.58, -0.34], p = 0.003), and secondary outcomes: MMSE recall (-0.39, 95% CI [-0.71, -0.07], p = 0.019), MMSE language (-0.26, 95% CI [-0.44, -0.07], p = 0.007), Auditory Verbal Learning Test instantaneous memory (-3.30, 95% CI [-5.70, -0.89], p = 0.008), Digit Symbol Substitution Test total score (-2.91, 95% CI [-5.67, -0.15], p = 0.039), digit span forwards (-1.25, 95% CI [-1.93, -0.56], p < 0.001), and Digit Span Test (-1.33, 95% CI [-2.33, -0.34], p = 0.009) compared to the control group. Improvements were observed in structural and functional connectivity related to language, concentration, executive function, memory, and recall functioning via MRI in the intervention group. Conclusions: The multimodal intervention improved cognitive function in individuals with MCI in cognitive performance and neuroimaging.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuropsychological TestsAgedChinaCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsMiddle AgedSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeAlzheimer’s diseasebehavior therapyclinical trialcognitive dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID39031354
PMCPMC11380217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.