Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39031331›Full record

ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2024

The adherence of Turkish emergency departments to geriatric guideline recommendations.

Şimşek Çelik, Pelin Çelik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European geriatric medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Do guidelines improve geriatric emergency care?European geriatric medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Şimşek ÇelikDepartment of Emergency, Faculty of Medicine, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey. drsimsek19@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1574-235X
Pelin ÇelikDepartment of Health Programs, Vocational School of Health Services, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1179-4227

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to determine the availability of geriatrics-friendly protocols, pieces of equipment, and physical environments alongside potential opportunities of improvement in the emergency departments of our country.

methodsThis prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted between the 1

resultsThe study was conducted with a total of 175 participants from hospital emergency departments. The number of hospitals with monthly older patient application amounts of 500 and above was 133 (76.0%). It was observed that personnel/management knowledge was, relative to guideline suggestions, at low levels. When the appropriateness of personnel/management knowledge and total equipment/materials were compared to hospital roles, it was determined that university hospitals adhered closest to the guideline and that inter-group differences were significant (p < 0.001).

conclusionsIt was determined that the compliance of emergency departments in Turkey with the criteria specified in the geriatric emergency department guidelines is at very low levels.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalGeriatricsGuideline AdherenceAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansMalePractice Guidelines as TopicProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyEmergency departmentGeriatric emergency department guidelineGeriatric emergency healthcareOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID39031331
PMCPMC11615048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.