ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2024
Safety and Efficacy of Multiple Escalating Doses of RC28-E for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Phase 1b Trial.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTo assess the safety and efficacy of repeated intravitreal injections of RC28-E, a novel bispecific antibody that simultaneously binds vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). This was a prospective, multicenter, open-label clinical trial; 37 patients with choroidal neovascularization secondary to AMD and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter scores between 73 and 34 were enrolled.
methodsTreatment regimens consisted of a 3-month loading phase and a pro re nata (PRN) maintenance phase. This study included three treatment groups: the 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg RC28-E groups, with escalating doses ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 mg. Patients were evaluated monthly for 48 weeks. Safety was assessed based on ocular and systemic adverse events (AEs), pharmacokinetic characteristics, and the presence of anti-RC28-E antibodies. Efficacy was assessed using the mean change in BCVA and central subfield thickness (CST) from baseline to week 48.
resultsMost AEs were mild or moderate. The most common AE was a minor injection-related subconjunctival hemorrhage (16.2%). The AEs did not increase with dose or repeated injections. At week 48, mean improvements in BCVA from baseline in the 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg groups were 6.1 ± 8.3, 9.9 ± 10.7, and 7.6 ± 9.38 letters, respectively; mean reductions in CST in the three groups were 112.1 ± 160.5, 175.1 ± 212.4, and 128.7 ± 145.8 μm, respectively. The serum RC28-E concentrations in 95% of the patients were below the quantification limit of the assay. No significant change from baseline was observed in the mean plasma concentrations of VEGF or FGF over the 48 weeks of treatment. Pre-treatment antibodies to RC28-E were detected in 1 of the 37 patients. Antibodies to RC28-E were detected in two patients after dosing with RC28-E for 48 weeks.
conclusionRC28-E was well tolerated and exhibited an overall favorable safety profile with evidence of improvements in BCVA and anatomical parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.