Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39031236›Full record

SynthesisHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2024

Comparison of postoperative chronic inguinal pain between the lichtenstein and laparoscopic techniques in the treatment of inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Valentina Guidi Lyra, Sofia Brandão Dos Santos, Carolina Bevilacqua Trigo Rocha, Fernando Augusto Garcia Guimarães, Wagner José Riva

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. No mesh fixation versus mesh fixation in laparoscopic groin hernia repair.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Valentina Guidi LyraFaculdade de Ciências Médicas de Santos, Department of General Surgery, Centro Universitário Lusíada, St. Oswaldo Cruz, 179-Boqueirão, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil. valentinaglyra@gmail.com.ORCID 0009-0009-6497-3809
Sofia Brandão Dos SantosFaculdade de Ciências Médicas de Santos, Department of General Surgery, Centro Universitário Lusíada, St. Oswaldo Cruz, 179-Boqueirão, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4961-8499
Carolina Bevilacqua Trigo RochaFaculdade de Ciências Médicas de Santos, Department of General Surgery, Centro Universitário Lusíada, St. Oswaldo Cruz, 179-Boqueirão, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6494-5159
Fernando Augusto Garcia GuimarãesFaculdade de Ciências Médicas de Santos, Department of General Surgery, Centro Universitário Lusíada, St. Oswaldo Cruz, 179-Boqueirão, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0005-4757-5033
Wagner José RivaFaculdade de Ciências Médicas de Santos, Department of General Surgery, Centro Universitário Lusíada, St. Oswaldo Cruz, 179-Boqueirão, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4278-4571

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCurrently, inguinal hernias are highly prevalent in the Brazilian population, accounting for 75% of all abdominal wall hernias. The recommended treatment to correct them is inguinal herniorrhaphy, which can be performed through open surgery, mainly using the Lichtenstein technique, or laparoscopically, primarily through Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair (TAPP) or Total Extraperitoneal Repair (TEP) approaches. Like any surgery, these procedures have post-operative complications, with pain being the most common and debilitating. Currently, in European and Brazilian guidelines, the open Lichtenstein and endoscopic inguinal hernia techniques are recommended as best evidence-based options for repair of a primary unilateral hernia providing the surgeon is sufficiently experienced in the specific procedure. In that matter, the surgeon should make a choice based on assessment of the benefits and risks of performing each of them, and practice shared making decision with it patient. Therefore, the objective of this review was to assess the incidence of chronic postoperative pain by comparing the aforementioned surgical approaches to evaluate which procedure causes less disability to the patient.

methodsThe search conducted until May 2024 was performed on Medline (PubMed), Cochrane (CENTRAL), and Lilacs databases. The selection was limited to randomized clinical trials, nonrandomized clinical trials and cohort studies comparing TAPP or TEP to LC, evaluating the incidence of chronic postoperative pain published between 2017 and 2023. Evidence certainty was assessed using the GRADE Pro tool, and bias risk was evaluated with the RoB 2.0 tool and ROBINS I tool. Thirteen studies were included. 

resultsThe meta-analysis showed a significant difference between the groups in both techniques, favoring the laparoscopic approach, which had a lower occurrence of postoperative inguinodynia with a relative risk of 0.49 (95% CI = 0.32, 0.75; I

conclusionThe presence of chronic postoperative pain was lower in laparoscopic TEP/TAPP techniques when compared to the open Lichtenstein technique, meaning that the former can bring more benefits to patients who requires inguinal herniorrhaphy. Nevertheless, further randomized clinical trials are needed to optimize the analysis, minimizing the bias.

Indexed as

Chronic PainHernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyLaparoscopyPostoperative PainHumansSurgical MeshChronic postoperative painInguinal herniaLichtenstein techniquePostoperative inguinodyniaTAPP (transabdominal preperitoneal repair)TEP (total extraperitoneal repair)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.