Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39031127›Full record

SynthesisNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2025

A Systematic Review of Predictors of Vaping Cessation Among Young People.

Anasua Kundu, Siddharth Seth, Daniel Felsky, Theo J Moraes, Peter Selby, Michael Chaiton

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Systematic Review of Predictors of Vaping Cessation Among Young People.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Understanding Reasons to Quit or Reduce Vaping and Associations With Quitting Outcomes Among High School Adolescents in Connecticut.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anasua KunduInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0051-5816
Siddharth SethHealth Science, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel FelskyInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Theo J MoraesInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Peter SelbyInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5401-2996
Michael ChaitonInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9589-2122

Funding

CIHR # 419710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsUnderstanding the factors influencing vaping cessation among young people is crucial for targeted interventions. This review aimed to summarize the individual and environmental factors that predict vaping cessation-related behaviors in the young population.

methodsWe systematically searched five databases for studies investigating predictors of vaping cessation behaviors among young people aged 10-35 years. Studies that examined predictors of cessation of cigarettes, other tobacco products, cannabis vaping, and studies evaluating efficacy of cessation interventions were excluded. Quality in Prognosis Studies tool was used to assess risk of bias.

resultsWe found 24 studies analyzing predictors of intention to quit vaping (n = 15), quit attempts (n = 11), and vaping abstinence (n = 7). Most studies had low risk of bias, except for study attrition. We identified 107 predictors and grouped them into "probable," "possible," "insufficient evidence," "probably unrelated," and "inconsistent direction" categories. For "probable" predictors, we found 11 for intention to quit, eight for quit attempts and five for vaping abstinence. Overall, harm perception of vaping, current other tobacco products use, frequency of use, and level of nicotine dependence were common "probable" predictors across three outcomes, with low harm perception of vaping, dual use, and poly tobacco use associated with decreased intention to quit and quit attempts in younger population (~10-19 years).

conclusionsPredictive modeling studies investigating vaping cessation-related behaviors among young people are still limited. Future research should specifically study the natural history of vaping in youth in different jurisdictions, populations, and age groups to expand our knowledge in this area. IMPLICATIONS: We identified and categorized predictors of intention to quit vaping, quit attempts, and vaping abstinence among young people. While the "probable" predictors can inform public health and policymakers to plan targeted vaping cessation programs for high-risk populations, raising public harm perception of vaping and encouraging to quit other tobacco products might increase intention to quit and quit attempts among younger population. However, the "possible," "insufficient evidence" and "inconsistent direction" predictors need further testing by future prospective longitudinal research. Additionally, we emphasized the significance of appropriate study designs, conducting research across various jurisdictions, and different population groups to obtain comprehensive insights.

Indexed as

VapingAdolescentAdultChildElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansIntentionMaleSmoking CessationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39031127
PMCPMC11750738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.