ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2024
Enhancing SILCS-MC via GPU Acceleration and Ligand Conformational Optimization with Genetic and Parallel Tempering Algorithms.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Docking-score landscapes shape active-learning performance across Vina, Glide, and SILCS.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Computational Modeling of PROTAC Ternary Complexes as Ensembles Using SILCS-xTAC.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Computational Ligand-Binding Site Prediction.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Combined Physics- and Machine-Learning-Based Method to Identify Druggable Binding Sites Using SILCS-Hotspots.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the domain of computer-aided drug design, achieving precise and accurate estimates of ligand-protein binding is paramount in the context of screening extensive drug libraries and performing ligand optimization. A fundamental aspect of the SILCS (site identification by ligand competitive saturation) methodology lies in the generation of comprehensive 3D free-energy functional group affinity maps (FragMaps), encompassing the entirety of the target molecule structure. These FragMaps offer an intricate landscape of functional group affinities across the protein, bilayer, or RNA, acting as the basis for subsequent SILCS-Monte Carlo (MC) simulations wherein ligands are docked to the target molecule. To augment the efficiency and breadth of ligand sampling capabilities, we implemented an improved SILCS-MC methodology. By harnessing the parallel computing capability of GPUs, our approach facilitates concurrent calculations over multiple ligands and binding sites, markedly enhancing the computational efficiency. Moreover, the integration of a genetic algorithm (GA) with MC allows us to employ an evolutionary approach to perform ligand sampling, assuring enhanced convergence characteristics. In addition, the potential utility of parallel tempering (PT) to improve sampling was investigated. Implementation of SILCS-MC on GPU architecture is shown to accelerate the speed of SILCS-MC calculations by over 2-orders of magnitude. Use of GA and PT yield improvements over Markov-chain MC, increasing the precision of the resultant docked orientations and binding free energies, though the extent of improvements is relatively small. Accordingly, significant improvements in speed are obtained through the GPU implementation with minor improvements in the precision of the docking obtained via the tested GA and PT algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.