Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39030898›Full record

ArticleArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2024

Gut Microbiome and Osteoarthritis: Insights From the Naturally Occurring Canine Model of Osteoarthritis.

Christina Stevens, Samantha Norris, Liubov Arbeeva, Scott Carter, Masataka Enomoto, Amanda E Nelson, B Duncan X Lascelles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Intestinal microbiota and arthritis.EULAR rheumatology open · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Multidrug-ResistantVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Gut Microbiota Variation in Aging Dogs with Osteoarthritis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Management Effects on Gastrointestinal Disease in Red Wolves (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christina StevensTranslational Research in Pain, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9771-9007
Samantha NorrisTranslational Research in Pain, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Liubov ArbeevaThurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5004-419X
Scott CarterPhibrio Animal Health, Teaneck, New Jersey.
Masataka EnomotoTranslational Research in Pain, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Amanda E NelsonThurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9344-7877
B Duncan X LascellesTranslational Research in Pain, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Comparative Pain Research and Education Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, and the Center for Translational Pain Research, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2950-9009

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to enhance the current knowledge of the relationship between the gut microbiome and osteoarthritis (OA) and associated pain using pet dogs as a clinically relevant translational model.

methodsFecal samples were collected from 93 owned pet dogs. Dogs were designated as either clinically healthy or OA pain using validated methods. Metagenomic profiling was performed through shotgun sequencing using the Illumina NovaSeq platform. MetaPhlAn2 and HUMAnN2 were used to evaluate bacterial taxonomic and pathway relative abundance. Comparisons between healthy and OA-pain groups were performed individually for each taxa using nonparametric tests following Benjamini and Hochberg adjustment for multiple comparisons. Permutation analysis of variance was performed using Bray-Curtis distance matrices. All downstream analyses were completed in R.

resultsNo significant differences between healthy and OA-pain dogs were observed for alpha and beta diversity. We found 13 taxa with nominally significant (P < 0.05) associations with OA case status, but none of the associations remained significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons. No differences in alpha or beta diversities or the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio were found regarding pain severity, mobility or activity level, age, or body composition score.

conclusionSimilar to recent studies in humans, the present study did not demonstrate a significant difference in the fecal microbial communities between dogs with OA pain and healthy control dogs. Future research in this naturally occurring model should expand on these data and relate the gut microbiome to gut permeability and circulating proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory molecules to better understand the influence of the gut microbiome on OA and OA pain.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeOsteoarthritisAnimalsBacillotaDogsFemaleMaleMetagenomicsPain

Identifiers

PMID39030898
PMCPMC11605265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.