Observational studyCancer medicine2024
Real-world first-line treatment with pembrolizumab for non-small cell lung carcinoma with high PD-L1 expression: Updated analysis.
Observational study in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- First-Line Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Real-World Study from Vietnam.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy vs. combination therapy in elderly advanced NSCLC: a real-world study and nomogram for survival prognosis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Real-world data of first-line treatment with pembrolizumab for NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression in elderly patients: a subgroup analysis of HOT/NJLCG2001.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2025Observational
- Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Real-world first-line treatment with pembrolizumab for non-small cell lung carcinoma with high PD-L1 expression: Updated analysis.Cancer medicine · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSelecting pembrolizumab monotherapy (MONO) or pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (COMB) for patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is an important issue in clinical practice. We previously conducted a retrospective multicenter observational study of patients with NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression who received MONO or COMB as a first-line treatment. Here, we report updated data and evaluate the long-term outcomes.
methodsWe performed a retrospective multicenter study of 298 patients with NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression who received MONO or COMB as first-line treatment between December 2018 and January 2020. We reviewed the medical records and assessed the clinical efficacy and toxicity using a prolonged data cutoff.
resultsIn total, 164 (median age: 74 years) and 134 (median age: 68 years) patients received MONO and COMB, respectively; patients who received COMB were younger and had better performance statuses (0-1). At the prolonged data cutoff, the median follow-up was 20.2 (range: 0.1-41.4) months. The median progression-free survivals were 7.5 and 13.1 months, and overall survivals (OSs) were 17.2 and 33.7 months for MONO and COMB, respectively. Treatment discontinuation rates were 21.9% and 20.1% for the MONO and COMB, respectively. With prolonged follow-up, although COMB demonstrated an OS benefit and higher objective response rate than MONO, in the propensity score matching analysis COMB didn't demonstrate a significant benefit compared to the MONO.
conclusionsCOMB may be effective as a first-line treatment for NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression in a selected subset of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.