Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39030893›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2024

Quality of care for dual eligible beneficiaries in the oncology care model.

Xinyu Liang, Ziwei Zhu, Kassem Faraj, Vahakn B Shahinian, Brent K Hollenbeck, Lindsey A Herrel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xinyu LiangRoss School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Ziwei ZhuDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Kassem FarajDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2130-0446
Vahakn B ShahinianDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Brent K HollenbeckDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Lindsey A HerrelDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0221-0784

Funding

Understanding the effects of the Oncology Care Model on cancer care for dual eligible patientsK08CA237638 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HERREL, LINDSEY ALLISON · 2019 to 2023
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS 1K08CA237638-01NCI NIH HHS K08 CA237638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDual eligible beneficiaries are a vulnerable population who often experience inferior access to care and outcomes compared to non-dual eligible beneficiaries. The Oncology Care Model (OCM) is an alternative payment model that aims to improve coordination and quality of care in beneficiaries receiving chemotherapy and thus may improve care for dual eligible beneficiaries with cancer.

methodsWe used 100% Medicare claims data from 2014 through 2019 and included beneficiaries with bladder, breast, esophageal, colorectal, kidney, lung, pancreatic, or prostate cancer receiving chemotherapy. We constructed multivariable difference-in-differences regression models to evaluate the effect of OCM participation on healthcare utilization and quality of care at the end-of-life among dual eligible beneficiaries. We also compared healthcare utilization and quality of care outcomes to non-dual eligible beneficiaries.

resultsWe identified 3,043,944 episodes of care among 1,260,892 unique Medicare beneficiaries. Ten percent of all beneficiaries (n = 126,758) were dual eligible and 64,087 (22%) of episodes among dual eligible patients were in an OCM participating practice. We noted no effect of OCM participation on healthcare utilization or end-of-life quality of care for dual eligible beneficiaries. However, we observed higher rates of hospitalization, emergency department visits, intensive care unit stays, and a lower number of office visits among dual eligible beneficiaries compared to non-dual eligible beneficiaries.

conclusionsParticipation in OCM was not associated with improvements in quality of care or healthcare utilization for dual eligible beneficiaries. Dual eligible beneficiaries experience lower quality of care across several measures compared to non-dual eligible beneficiaries. Focused policies and incentives may be necessary to address disparities within emerging health reforms.

Indexed as

MedicareNeoplasmsQuality of Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMedical OncologyPatient Acceptance of Health CareTerminal CareUnited Statesclinical managementmedical oncologyQOLquality of Life

Identifiers

PMID39030893
PMCPMC11258196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.