Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39030622›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Email recruitment for chronic pain clinical trials: results from the LAMP trial.

John E Ferguson, Emily Hagel Campbell, Ann Bangerter, Lee J S Cross, Kelli D Allen, Kimberly Behrens, Mariah Branson, Collin Calvert, Jessica K Friedman, Sierra Hennessy and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04526158 (Testing Two Scalable, Veteran-centric Mindfulness-based Interventions for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04526158 nacompletednot on this map

Testing Two Scalable, Veteran-centric Mindfulness-based Interventions for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Pragmatic, Multisite Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnited States Department of DefenseRan2020 to 2023Enrolled811ConditionsChronic PainArmsMobile+Group LAMP Mindfulness-Based Intervention, Mobile LAMP Mindfulness-Based Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

John E FergusonDivisions of PM&R and Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Emily Hagel CampbellCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA.
Ann BangerterCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA.
Lee J S CrossCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA. lee.cross@va.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1158-4953
Kelli D AllenCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.
Kimberly BehrensCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA.
Mariah BransonCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA.
Collin CalvertCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA.
Jessica K FriedmanCenter for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sierra HennessyCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA.
Laura A MeisCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA.
Brent C TaylorCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA.
Diana J BurgessCenter for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 55417, USA.

Funding

Pain Management Collaboratory Coordinating Center (PMC3)U24AT009769 · NCCIH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM C BECKER, Alicia Heapy · 2017 to 2026
$16.4M
NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT009769U.S. Department of Defense W81XWH-18-2-0003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecruitment for clinical trials and large-scale studies is challenging, especially for patients with complex conditions like chronic pain. Email recruitment has the potential to increase efficiency, to reduce costs, and to improve access for underrepresented patient populations. The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness, efficiency, and equitability of email versus postal mail recruitment for the Learning to Apply Mindfulness to Pain (LAMP) study, a three-site clinical trial of mindfulness-based interventions for chronic pain.

methodsPatients with chronic pain diagnoses were recruited from three United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities using the VA electronic health record (EHR). Recruitment materials were sent using either postal mail (n = 7986) or email (n = 19,333). Patients in the email recruitment group were also mailed introductory postcards before any emails. Mailing addresses and email addresses were obtained from the EHR. Effectiveness was measured by the response rate of patients who logged into the secure LAMP study website. Efficiency was measured by the number of days from when the recruitment materials were sent to when patients logged into the LAMP portal as well as the estimated costs of each recruitment approach. To assess equitability, we examined whether email recruitment was less effective for underrepresented populations, based on demographic information from the EHR.

resultsEffectiveness-unadjusted response rates were greater for email versus postal-mail recruitment (18.9% versus 6.3%), and adjusted response rates were over three times greater for email recruitment (RR = 3.5, 95% CI 3.1-3.8) based on a multivariable analysis controlling for age, gender, race, ethnicity, rurality, and site. Efficiency-email recruitment had a significantly lower mean response time (1 day versus 8 days) and a lower cost. Equity-email recruitment led to higher response rates for all subpopulations, including older, non-White, Hispanic, rural, and female Veterans.

conclusionsEmail recruitment is an effective, efficient, and equitable way to recruit VA patients to large-scale, chronic pain clinical trials.

trial registrationClinical Trial Registration Number: NCT04526158. Patient enrollment began on December 4, 2020.

Indexed as

Chronic PainElectronic MailPatient SelectionAdultAgedElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostal ServiceUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsChronic painEmailMindfulnessPragmatic clinical trialRecruitment

Identifiers

PMID39030622
PMCPMC11264665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.