ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2024
Reaction rebalancing: a novel approach to curating reaction databases.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extension of partial atom-to-atom maps: uniqueness and algorithms.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2026Article
- SynRXN: An Open Benchmark and Curated Dataset for Computational Reaction Modeling.Scientific data · 2026Article
- SynTemp: Efficient Extraction of Graph-Based Reaction Rules from Large-Scale Reaction Databases.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Machine learning-guided strategies for reaction conditions design and optimization.Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeReaction databases are a key resource for a wide variety of applications in computational chemistry and biochemistry, including Computer-aided Synthesis Planning (CASP) and the large-scale analysis of metabolic networks. The full potential of these resources can only be realized if datasets are accurate and complete. Missing co-reactants and co-products, i.e., unbalanced reactions, however, are the rule rather than the exception. The curation and correction of such incomplete entries is thus an urgent need.
methodsThe SynRBL framework addresses this issue with a dual-strategy: a rule-based method for non-carbon compounds, using atomic symbols and counts for prediction, alongside a Maximum Common Subgraph (MCS)-based technique for carbon compounds, aimed at aligning reactants and products to infer missing entities.
resultsThe rule-based method exceeded 99% accuracy, while MCS-based accuracy varied from 81.19 to 99.33%, depending on reaction properties. Furthermore, an applicability domain and a machine learning scoring function were devised to quantify prediction confidence. The overall efficacy of this framework was delineated through its success rate and accuracy metrics, which spanned from 89.83 to 99.75% and 90.85 to 99.05%, respectively.
conclusionThe SynRBL framework offers a novel solution for recalibrating chemical reactions, significantly enhancing reaction completeness. With rigorous validation, it achieved groundbreaking accuracy in reaction rebalancing. This sets the stage for future improvement in particular of atom-atom mapping techniques as well as of downstream tasks such as automated synthesis planning. SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTION: SynRBL features a novel computational approach to correcting unbalanced entries in chemical reaction databases. By combining heuristic rules for inferring non-carbon compounds and common subgraph searches to address carbon unbalance, SynRBL successfully addresses most instances of this problem, which affects the majority of data in most large-scale resources. Compared to alternative solutions, SynRBL achieves a dramatic increase in both success rate and accurary, and provides the first freely available open source solution for this problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.