SynthesisBMC cancer2024
Risk factors for esophageal anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Stapled vs. hand-sewn anastomosis during esophagectomy: a randomized trials systematic review and meta-analysis.Updates in surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Ivor Lewis minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus McKeown approach: short-term benefits and mid-term equivalence in a randomized trial for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Trial
- Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided oesophago-gastric anastomosis for management of complete lumen occlusion post-oesophagectomy.Endoscopy · 2026Article
- Predicting need for step-up approach and recurrence in endoscopic management of anastomotic strictures after esophagectomy: results from a 10-year multicenter retrospective study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Advances in the treatment of postoperative anastomotic strictures in esophageal cancer a comparative analysis of the efficacy of endoscopic versus interventional dilatation.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Review
- Risk Factors for Anastomotic Stricture and Obstructive Symptoms Following Double-Flap Technique Reconstruction After Proximal Gastrectomy.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- Histological Predictors of Anastomotic Stenosis in Esophageal Substitution Surgery.Clinical medicine & research · 2026Article
- Identification and validation of an explainable machine learning model for early postoperative pulmonary complications after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- The Impact of Endoscopic Dilatation in Post-Esophagectomy Anastomotic Stricture: Risk Factors and Treatment Outcomes.Cureus · 2026Article
- Variations in morbidity and mortality based on esophagectomy approach and leak status: Insights from a statewide quality collaborative.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Prediction of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a nomogram study integrating systemic inflammation indices and clinical factors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Association and incremental predictive value of preoperative AISI and CALLY for postoperative pulmonary complications after McKeown esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- OTSC combined with jejunal mucosal ESD for closure of jejunal dilated blind pouch and anastomotic metal stent placement in the treatment of post-oesophagojejunostomy stricture: a case report (with video).Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of anastomotic stricture rates between 23- and 25-mm powered circular staplers in cervical esophagogastric anastomosis: a propensity-matched study.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2026Article
- Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Patients Under 60 Years of Age.Cancers · 2025Article
- Article
- Development and validation of a LASSO-based nomogram for predicting anastomotic leakage in elderly patients after laparoscopic gastrectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Automated machine learning model for predicting anastomotic strictures after esophageal cancer surgery: a retrospective cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- The Endoscopic Management of Anastomotic Strictures After Esophagogastric Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Emerging Approaches Beyond Endoscopic Dilation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy: When and How to Use It?GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the risk factors for anastomotic stricture in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy. Esophageal anastomotic stricture is the most common long-term complication for esophagectomy. The risk factors for esophageal anastomotic stricture still remain controversial.
methodsMEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched to identify observational studies reporting the risk factors for esophageal anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy. A meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the impact of various risk factors on esophageal anastomotic stricture. The GRADE [Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation] approach was used for quality assessment of evidence on outcome levels.
resultsThis review included 14 studies evaluating 5987 patients.The meta-analysis found that anastomotic leakage (odds ratio [OR]: 2.75; 95% confidence interval[CI]:2.16-3.49), cardiovascular disease [OR:1.62; 95% CI: 1.22-2.16],diabete [OR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.20-2.19] may be risk factors for esophageal anastomotic stricture.There were no association between neoadjuvant therapy [OR: 0.78; 95% CI:0.62-0.97], wide gastric conduit [OR:0.98; 95% CI: 0.37-2.56],mechanical anastomosis [OR: 0.84; 95% CI:0.47-1.48],colonic interposition[OR:0.20; 95% CI: 0.12-0.35],and transhiatal approach[OR:1.16; 95% CI:0.81-1.64],with the risk of esophageal anastomotic stricture.
conclusionsThis meta-analysis provides some evidence that anastomotic leakage,cardiovascular disease and diabete may be associated with higher rates of esophageal anastomotic stricture.Knowledge about those risk factors may influence treatment and procedure-related decisions,and possibly reduce the anastomotic stricture rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.