Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39030519›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Impact of group work on the hidden curriculum that induces students' unprofessional behavior toward faculty.

Aoba Nakamura, Hajime Kasai, Mayumi Asahina, Yu Kamata, Kiyoshi Shikino, Ikuo Shimizu, Misaki Onodera, Yasuhiko Kimura, Hiroshi Tajima, Kazuyo Yamauchi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Aoba NakamuraDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Hajime KasaiDepartment of Medical Education, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan. daikasai6075@yahoo.co.jp.
Mayumi AsahinaHealth Professional Development Centre, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Yu KamataHealth Professional Development Centre, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Kiyoshi ShikinoDepartment of Medical Education, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Ikuo ShimizuDepartment of Medical Education, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Misaki OnoderaDepartment of Medical Education, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Yasuhiko KimuraHealth Professional Development Centre, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Hiroshi TajimaDepartment of Medical Education, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Kazuyo YamauchiDepartment of Medical Education, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Shoichi ItoDepartment of Medical Education, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHidden curriculum (HC) can limit the effects of professionalism education. However, the research on how HC triggers unprofessional behavior among medical students is scant. Furthermore, there is no established approach for how faculty members may create a context, such as an educational environment and education system, that prevents students' unprofessional behavior. This study aimed to develop an educational approach to prevent unprofessional behavior and clarify how faculty members consider HC that triggers students' unprofessional behavior.

methodsThe study sample comprised 44 faculty members and eight medical students from the Chiba University School of Medicine. The participants were divided into groups and asked the following question: "What attitudes, statements, and behaviors of senior students, physicians, and faculty members trigger medical students' unprofessional behavior?" The responses were collected using the affinity diagram method. The group members discussed the causes and countermeasures for the selected attitudes, statements, and behaviors of senior students, physicians, and faculty members based on the affinity diagram. The impact of the group work on the faculty members was surveyed using questionnaires immediately after its completion and six months later. Furthermore, the cards in the group work were analyzed using content analysis.

resultsThe responses to the questionnaire on group work indicated that some faculty members (43.8%) improved HC, while others suggested conducting group work with more participants. The content analysis revealed six categories - inappropriate attitude/behavior, behavior encouraging unprofessional behavior, lack of compliance with regulations, harassment of other medical staff, inappropriate educational environment/supervisor, and inappropriate self-control - and 46 subcategories.

conclusionsThe HC that triggers students' unprofessional behavior includes the words and actions of the educator, organizational culture, and educational environment. Group work makes faculty members aware of the HC that triggers unprofessional behavior, and induces behavioral change for HC improvement in the educational activities. Educators should refrain from using words and actions that encourage unprofessional behavior, such as personal anecdotes, as they reduce students' learning motivation.

Indexed as

CurriculumFaculty, MedicalStudents, MedicalAttitude of Health PersonnelEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleGroup ProcessesHumansMaleProfessionalismProfessional MisconductSurveys and QuestionnairesAffinity diagramHidden curriculumProfessionalismUnprofessional behavior

Identifiers

PMID39030519
PMCPMC11264808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.