Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39030508›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2024

Computer-aided diagnosis system for grading brain tumor using histopathology images based on color and texture features.

Naira Elazab, Wael Gab Allah, Mohammed Elmogy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Naira ElazabInformation Technology Department, Faculty of Computers and Information, Mansoura University, 35516, Mansoura, Egypt.
Wael Gab AllahInformation Technology Department, Faculty of Computers and Information, Mansoura University, 35516, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mohammed ElmogyInformation Technology Department, Faculty of Computers and Information, Mansoura University, 35516, Mansoura, Egypt. melmogy@mans.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer pathology shows disease development and associated molecular features. It provides extensive phenotypic information that is cancer-predictive and has potential implications for planning treatment. Based on the exceptional performance of computational approaches in the field of digital pathogenic, the use of rich phenotypic information in digital pathology images has enabled us to identify low-level gliomas (LGG) from high-grade gliomas (HGG). Because the differences between the textures are so slight, utilizing just one feature or a small number of features produces poor categorization results.

methodsIn this work, multiple feature extraction methods that can extract distinct features from the texture of histopathology image data are used to compare the classification outcomes. The successful feature extraction algorithms GLCM, LBP, multi-LBGLCM, GLRLM, color moment features, and RSHD have been chosen in this paper. LBP and GLCM algorithms are combined to create LBGLCM. The LBGLCM feature extraction approach is extended in this study to multiple scales using an image pyramid, which is defined by sampling the image both in space and scale. The preprocessing stage is first used to enhance the contrast of the images and remove noise and illumination effects. The feature extraction stage is then carried out to extract several important features (texture and color) from histopathology images. Third, the feature fusion and reduction step is put into practice to decrease the number of features that are processed, reducing the computation time of the suggested system. The classification stage is created at the end to categorize various brain cancer grades. We performed our analysis on the 821 whole-slide pathology images from glioma patients in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. Two types of brain cancer are included in the dataset: GBM and LGG (grades II and III). 506 GBM images and 315 LGG images are included in our analysis, guaranteeing representation of various tumor grades and histopathological features.

resultsThe fusion of textural and color characteristics was validated in the glioma patients using the 10-fold cross-validation technique with an accuracy equals to 95.8%, sensitivity equals to 96.4%, DSC equals to 96.7%, and specificity equals to 97.1%. The combination of the color and texture characteristics produced significantly better accuracy, which supported their synergistic significance in the predictive model. The result indicates that the textural characteristics can be an objective, accurate, and comprehensive glioma prediction when paired with conventional imagery.

conclusionThe results outperform current approaches for identifying LGG from HGG and provide competitive performance in classifying four categories of glioma in the literature. The proposed model can help stratify patients in clinical studies, choose patients for targeted therapy, and customize specific treatment schedules.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrain NeoplasmsColorGliomaNeoplasm GradingDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedCancer gradesColor featuresEnsemble classifierGlioma computational pathologyTexture features

Identifiers

PMID39030508
PMCPMC11264763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.