Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39030496›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2024

Explainable lung cancer classification with ensemble transfer learning of VGG16, Resnet50 and InceptionV3 using grad-cam.

Yogesh Kumaran S, J Jospin Jeya, Mahesh T R, Surbhi Bhatia Khan, Saeed Alzahrani, Mohammed Alojail

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yogesh Kumaran SDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), Bengaluru, 562112, India.
J Jospin JeyaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Ramapuram, Chennai, India.
Mahesh T RDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), Bengaluru, 562112, India. trmahesh.1978@gmail.com.
Surbhi Bhatia KhanSchool of science, engineering and environment, University of Salford, Manchester, UK.
Saeed AlzahraniManagement Information System Department, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AlojailManagement Information System Department, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical imaging stands as a critical component in diagnosing various diseases, where traditional methods often rely on manual interpretation and conventional machine learning techniques. These approaches, while effective, come with inherent limitations such as subjectivity in interpretation and constraints in handling complex image features. This research paper proposes an integrated deep learning approach utilizing pre-trained models-VGG16, ResNet50, and InceptionV3-combined within a unified framework to improve diagnostic accuracy in medical imaging. The method focuses on lung cancer detection using images resized and converted to a uniform format to optimize performance and ensure consistency across datasets. Our proposed model leverages the strengths of each pre-trained network, achieving a high degree of feature extraction and robustness by freezing the early convolutional layers and fine-tuning the deeper layers. Additionally, techniques like SMOTE and Gaussian Blur are applied to address class imbalance, enhancing model training on underrepresented classes. The model's performance was validated on the IQ-OTH/NCCD lung cancer dataset, which was collected from the Iraq-Oncology Teaching Hospital/National Center for Cancer Diseases over a period of three months in fall 2019. The proposed model achieved an accuracy of 98.18%, with precision and recall rates notably high across all classes. This improvement highlights the potential of integrated deep learning systems in medical diagnostics, providing a more accurate, reliable, and efficient means of disease detection.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLung NeoplasmsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerTomography, X-Ray ComputedDeep learningDiagnostic accuracyFeature extractionImage classificationInceptionV3Lung cancer detectionMedical imagingResNet50SMOTEVGG16

Identifiers

PMID39030496
PMCPMC11264852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.