Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39030369›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2024

Engineered Chlorella vulgaris improves bioethanol production and promises prebiotic application.

Sumedha Saha, Sachin Maji, Sudip K Ghosh, Mrinal K Maiti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effects of dietaryVeterinary and animal science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Acetate Combined with COFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Electron spin resonance in microalgae whole-cells to monitor hydrogen production.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sumedha SahaAdvanced Laboratory for Plant Genetic Engineering, Advanced Technology Development Centre, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, 721302, India.
Sachin MajiDepartment of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, 721302, India.
Sudip K GhoshDepartment of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, 721302, India.
Mrinal K MaitiDepartment of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, 721302, India. mrinalkmaiti@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7803-4356

Funding

Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India BT/EB/PAN IIT/2012 Dated 08/12/2014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microalgal biomass for biofuel production, integration into functional food, and feed supplementation has generated substantial interest worldwide due to its high growth rate, non-competitiveness for agronomic land, ease of cultivation in containments, and presence of several bioactive molecules. In this study, genetic engineering tools were employed to develop transgenic lines of freshwater microalga Chlorella vulgaris with a higher starch content, by up-regulating ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase), which is a rate-limiting enzyme in starch biosynthesis. Expression of the Escherichia coli glgC (AGPase homolog) gene in C. vulgaris led to an increase in total carbohydrate content up to 45.1% (dry cell weight, DCW) in the transgenic line as compared to 34.2% (DCW) in the untransformed control. The starch content improved up to 16% (DCW) in the transgenic alga compared to 10% (DCW) in the control. However, the content of total lipid, carotenoid, and chlorophyll decreased differentially in the transgenic lines. The carbohydrate-rich biomass from the transgenic algal line was used to produce bioethanol via yeast fermentation, which resulted in a higher ethanol yield of 82.82 mg/L as compared to 54.41 mg/L from the untransformed control. The in vitro digestibility of the transgenic algal starch revealed a resistant starch content of up to 7% of total starch. Faster growth of four probiotic bacterial species along with a lowering of the pH of the growth medium indicated transgenic alga to exert a positive prebiotic effect. Taken together, the study documents the utilization of genetically engineered C. vulgaris with enriched carbohydrates as bioethanol feedstock and functional food ingredients.

Indexed as

BiofuelsBiomassChlorella vulgarisEscherichia coliEthanolFermentationGlucose-1-Phosphate AdenylyltransferaseMicroalgaePrebioticsStarchEscherichia coli ProteinsGenetic EngineeringMetabolic EngineeringBiofuelsEscherichia coli ProteinsEthanolGlucose-1-Phosphate AdenylyltransferasePrebioticsStarchAGPaseBioethanol productionChlorella vulgarisglgCPrebiotic effectsResistant starch

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.