Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39030354›Full record

ReviewAdvances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology2024

Mechanisms of DNA Damage Response in Mammalian Oocytes.

Fei Sun, Peter Sutovsky, Amanda L Patterson, Ahmed Z Balboula

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in anatomy, embryology, and cell biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fei SunDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Peter SutovskyDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Amanda L PattersonDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Ahmed Z BalboulaDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. abalboula@missouri.edu.

Funding

Mechanisms underpinning meiotic spindle formation and behaviorR35GM142537 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI AHMED BALBOULA · 2021 to 2026
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA damage poses a significant challenge to all eukaryotic cells, leading to mutagenesis, genome instability and senescence. In somatic cells, the failure to repair damaged DNA can lead to cancer development, whereas, in oocytes, it can lead to ovarian dysfunction and infertility. The response of the cell to DNA damage entails a series of sequential and orchestrated events including sensing the DNA damage, activating DNA damage checkpoint, chromatin-related conformational changes, activating the DNA damage repair machinery and/or initiating the apoptotic cascade. This chapter focuses on how somatic cells and mammalian oocytes respond to DNA damage. Specifically, we will discuss how and why fully grown mammalian oocytes differ drastically from somatic cells and growing oocytes in their response to DNA damage.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairOocytesAnimalsApoptosisFemaleHumansMammalsAgingAutophagyDNA damage repairDNA damage responseMeiosisOocytePARP

Identifiers

PMID39030354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.