ArticleScientific reports2024
Avoidance of specific calibration sessions in motor intention recognition for exoskeleton-supported rehabilitation through transfer learning on EEG data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence Approaches for EEG Signal Acquisition and Processing in Lower-Limb Motor Imagery: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Applications of artificial intelligence in mechanical engineering for the field of upper limb exoskeletons.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Wearable technologies for assisted mobility in the real world.Nature communications · 2025Review
- Robotics in Physical Rehabilitation: Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exoskeleton-based support for patients requires the learning of individual machine-learning models to recognize movement intentions of patients based on the electroencephalogram (EEG). A major issue in EEG-based movement intention recognition is the long calibration time required to train a model. In this paper, we propose a transfer learning approach that eliminates the need for a calibration session. This approach is validated on healthy subjects in this study. We will use the proposed approach in our future rehabilitation application, where the movement intention of the affected arm of a patient can be inferred from the EEG data recorded during bilateral arm movements enabled by the exoskeleton mirroring arm movements from the unaffected to the affected arm. For the initial evaluation, we compared two trained models for predicting unilateral and bilateral movement intentions without applying a classifier transfer. For the main evaluation, we predicted unilateral movement intentions without a calibration session by transferring the classifier trained on data from bilateral movement intentions. Our results showed that the classification performance for the transfer case was comparable to that in the non-transfer case, even with only 4 or 8 EEG channels. Our results contribute to robotic rehabilitation by eliminating the need for a calibration session, since EEG data for training is recorded during the rehabilitation session, and only a small number of EEG channels are required for model training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.