Trial reportThe Lancet. Global health2024
Resistance-informed versus empirical management of viraemia in children and adolescents with HIV in Lesotho and Tanzania (GIVE MOVE trial): a multisite, open-label randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04233242 (Genotype-Informed Versus Empiric Management of VirEmia), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Genotype-Informed Versus Empiric Management of VirEmia (GIVE MOVE) in HIV-Infected Children and Adolescents on Antiretroviral Therapy: An Open-Label Randomised Clinical Trial
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- HIV drug resistance amongst children and adolescents with viraemia in Lesotho and Tanzania: a nested analysis in the GIVE MOVE trial.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Emerging Dolutegravir Resistance Among Children on Antiretroviral Therapy With Virological Failure in Malawi: Results From a 2023 National Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2026Article
- Can resistance testing improve outcomes for children and adolescents with HIV?The Lancet. Global health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChildren and adolescents with HIV taking antiretroviral therapy (ART) have high rates of viraemia. We assessed if genotypic resistance testing (GRT) to inform onward treatment improved treatment outcomes in Lesotho and Tanzania, two countries with little access to GRT.
methodsThe Genotype-Informed Versus Empirical Management of Viremia (GIVE MOVE) open-label, parallel-group randomised controlled trial enrolled children and adolescents with HIV between the ages of 6 months and 19 years, taking ART, and with a viral load at least 400 copies per mL. Participants were recruited from ten clinical centres and hospitals in Lesotho and Tanzania. Participants were electronically randomly allocated 1:1 to receive either GRT with expert recommendation (GRT group) or repeat viral-load testing and empirical onward treatment (usual care group). Participants and study staff were not masked, but the endpoint committee and laboratory staff conducting viral-load testing were. Participants in both groups received at least three sessions of enhanced adherence counselling, and in the GRT group, blood for GRT assessed via Sanger sequencing was drawn at enrolment. The composite primary endpoint was death, hospitalisation, a new WHO HIV clinical stage 4 event, or not having documented viral suppression of less than 50 copies per mL at 36 weeks in the modified intention-to-treat population, which excluded participants who were retrospectively found to be ineligible after randomisation. Serious adverse events were analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04233242) and the trial status is completed.
findingsBetween March 3, 2020, and July 5, 2022, 286 participants were enrolled and 284 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (144 in the GRT group and 140 in the usual care group). Of these participants, 158 (56%) were female and 126 (44%) were male. Five (3%) in the GRT group and four (3%) in the usual care group did not complete follow-up but were included in the primary analysis. The median age across both groups was 14 years (IQR 9-16). The composite primary endpoint occurred in 67 (47%) participants in the GRT group and 73 (52%) in the usual care group (adjusted odds ratio 0·79 [95% CI 0·49 to 1·27]; adjusted risk difference -0·06 [95% CI -0·17 to 0·06]; p=0·34); all participants reaching the composite primary endpoint had no documented viral suppression at 36 weeks. No deaths were recorded, and only one clinical stage 4 event requiring hospitalisation occurred (in the usual care group); this was the only serious adverse event recorded in the study.
interpretationGRT-informed management did not significantly improve treatment outcomes for children and adolescents with viraemia while taking ART.
fundingFondation Botnar, Swiss National Science Foundation, and Gottfried and Julia Bangerter-Rhyner Foundation. TRANSLATIONS: For the Sesotho and Swahili translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39030062What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.