Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39029944›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2024

GPs' reflections on prescribing addictive hypnotics to older people: a qualitative study.

Holgeir Skjeie, Mette Brekke, Trygve Skonnord

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Holgeir SkjeieGeneral Practice Research Unit, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway holgeir.skjeie@medisin.uio.no.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7586-8651
Mette BrekkeDepartment of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3454-2329
Trygve SkonnordDepartment of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4816-076X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe European guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of insomnia recommends, for all age groups, only restrictive, short-term, and periodic use of potentially addictive hypnotics. As in other European countries, in Norway, actual practice involving older patients differs substantially from this recommendation, as shown by the persistent high frequency of regular prescriptions of addictive hypnotics.

aimTo explore experienced Norwegian GPs' views of the regular prescription of addictive hypnotics to patients aged >70 years living at home. DESIGN &

settingIn-depth individual interviews of a purposive sample of experienced specialists in family medicine at GP offices in Southern Norway.

methodThe interviews used a semi-structured interview guide and were performed between June 2022 and January 2023. Reflexive thematic cross-case analysis was used to analyse the data.

resultsMost of the 11 GPs interviewed had more than 10 older patients who were prescribed hypnotics for daily use and the same number for intermittent prescription. Almost all prescriptions were of z-hypnotics. The GPs knew this was contrary to the guideline. Many were at ease with this fact. They emphasised the need to avoid creating new dependencies. The GPs considered these patients a selected minority within this age group with serious sleep problems, for whom few realistic alternatives were available and whose tolerance over time was better than expected. This logic of pragmatic practice reflected a patient-centred approach and respect for the patient's view in a shared decision-making process, combined with challenges of limited alternatives and resources.

conclusionA 'zero vision' on the prescription of addictive hypnotics to older people may neither be prudent nor realistic in the context of general practice.

Indexed as

addictionsagedgeneral practiceprimary healthcarequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID39029944
PMCPMC11687261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.