Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39029363›Full record

ArticleCognition2024

Idiosyncratic and shared contributions shape impressions from voices and faces.

Nadine Lavan, Clare A M Sutherland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Can conceptual beliefs shape impressions from voices?Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026
    Article
  2. Conceptual trait associations predict impressions of highly variable faces.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026
    Article
  3. Time after time: Voice perception from first impressions to identity recognition.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2025
    Review
  4. Autistic adults form first impressions from voices in similar ways to non-autistic adults.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2025
    Article
  5. Face evaluation: Findings, methods, and challenges.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nadine LavanDepartment of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: n.lavan@qmul.ac.uk.
Clare A M SutherlandSchool of Psychology, King's College, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom; School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 220448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voices elicit rich first impressions of what the person we are hearing might be like. Research stresses that these impressions from voices are shared across different listeners, such that people on average agree which voices sound trustworthy or old and which do not. However, can impressions from voices also be shaped by the 'ear of the beholder'? We investigated whether - and how - listeners' idiosyncratic, personal preferences contribute to first impressions from voices. In two studies (993 participants, 156 voices), we find evidence for substantial idiosyncratic contributions to voice impressions using a variance portioning approach. Overall, idiosyncratic contributions were as important as shared contributions to impressions from voices for inferred person characteristics (e.g., trustworthiness, friendliness). Shared contributions were only more influential for impressions of more directly apparent person characteristics (e.g., gender, age). Both idiosyncratic and shared contributions were reduced when stimuli were limited in their (perceived) variability, suggesting that natural variation in voices is key to understanding this impression formation. When comparing voice impressions to face impressions, we found that idiosyncratic and shared contributions to impressions similarly across modality when stimulus properties are closely matched - although voice impressions were overall less consistent than face impressions. We thus reconceptualise impressions from voices as being formed not only based on shared but also idiosyncratic contributions. We use this new framing to suggest future directions of research, including understanding idiosyncratic mechanisms, development, and malleability of voice impression formation.

Indexed as

Facial RecognitionSocial PerceptionVoiceAdolescentAdultAuditory PerceptionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultFaceFirst impressionsIndividual differencesPersonal tasteVoice

Identifiers

PMID39029363
PMCPMC7618124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.