Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39028712›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Safety climate in the operating room in the pre-pandemic and pandemic period of COVID-19: A mixed method study.

Rosilene Alves Ferreira, Cintia Silva Fassarella, Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes Ribeiro, Rosane Barreto Cardoso, Danielle de Mendonça Henrique, Flávia Giron Camerini, Rogério Marques de Souza, Ricardo de Oliveira Meneses

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rosilene Alves FerreiraDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7274-8753
Cintia Silva FassarellaDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Olga Maria Pimenta Lopes RibeiroNursing School of Porto, Higher School of Nursing of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9982-9537
Rosane Barreto CardosoDepartment of Fundamental Nursing/History of Nursing, Anna Nery School of Nursing, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Danielle de Mendonça HenriqueDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0656-1680
Flávia Giron CameriniDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rogério Marques de SouzaHead of the Nursing Unit of the Surgical Center, University Hospital Pedro Ernesto, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ricardo de Oliveira MenesesDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9962-2827

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo verify whether the COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on the safety climate based on the perception of the multiprofessional team in the operating room and to analyze the domains of the safety climate during the pre-pandemic and pandemic period of COVID-19, demonstrating the intersections of quantitative and qualitative approaches.

methodsMixed-method research using a convergent approach strategy, carried out in the operating room of a university hospital, located in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The nature of the quantitative phase was cross-sectional, and the nature of the qualitative phase was descriptive. We used the Pillar Integration Process to integrate the data. This research considered the pre-pandemic period was defined as before March 2020 and for the pandemic period, the 2nd and 3rd global waves. Research was approved by the institution's board management and ethics committee.

results145 health professionals participated in the quantitative approach, and 20 in the qualitative approach. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic was highlighted in the domains 'Perceived stress' (p-value = 0.017); 'Working conditions' (p-value = 0.040). Six categories emerged from the qualitative analysis, namely: Stress and professional performance due to COVID-19; Patient safety protocols in the operating room; Responsibility for patient safety, lack of effective communication and performance feedback; Biosafety of the professional staff in the operating room; Security culture maturity; Fair culture, organizational learning, and reporting mistakes. As a result of the data integration, 6 pillars were identified: Perception of communication in the operating room; Evolution of safety culture; Overview of protocol management and implementation; Fair organizational culture; Perception of stress due to COVID-19; Perception of professional performance due to COVID-19.

conclusionsThe impact that COVID-19 had on the safety climate in the operating room is evident. It underlines the need to implement strategies that support the solidification of attitudes aimed at patient safety, even in emergencies.

Indexed as

COVID-19Operating RoomsPandemicsAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrganizational CultureSafety ManagementSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID39028712
PMCPMC11259288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.