Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39028669›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Completion Rate and Positive Results Reporting Among Immunotherapy Trials in Breast Cancer, 2004-2023.

Marco Mariani, Giulia Viale, Barbara Galbardi, Luca Licata, Carlo Bosi, Matteo Dugo, Giulia Notini, Matteo M Naldini, Maurizio Callari, Carmen Criscitiello and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Timing of Recurrence after Neoadjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy in Patients with Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marco MarianiUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Giulia VialeUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Barbara GalbardiDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Luca LicataUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Carlo BosiUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Matteo DugoDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Giulia NotiniUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Matteo M NaldiniUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Maurizio CallariFondazione Michelangelo, Milan, Italy.
Carmen CriscitielloDivision of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Lajos PusztaiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Giampaolo BianchiniUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Clinical trials are the path to test and introduce new therapies in the clinic. Trials that are unable to produce results represent inefficiency in the system and may also undermine patient confidence in the new drug development process. Objectives: To survey the immunotherapy clinical trial landscape of breast cancer between January 2004 and April 2023 and examine what fraction of trials with primary completion date up to November 30, 2022, failed to report outcome, assessing the proportion of trials that yielded positive results and describing trial features associated with these 2 outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included breast cancer immunotherapy trials identified in ClinicalTrials.gov. Trial details and results were retrieved in December 2023. Google Scholar, PubMed, and LARVOL CLIN websites were also searched for reports. Main Outcomes and Measures: Trial outcome reported as abstract or manuscript. Reported trials were categorized as positive (ie, met its end point) or negative. Association between reporting and trial features were tested using Fisher exact test. Results: A total of 331 immuno-oncology trials were initiated in breast cancer by April 2023; 242 trials were phase II, 47 were phase I, and 42 phase III. By setting, 212 studies (64.0%) were conducted in metastatic, 94 (28.4%) in neoadjuvant, and 25 (7.6%) in adjuvant settings. Among phase II and III trials, 168 (59.2%) were nonrandomized. One hundred twenty trials had primary completion dates up to November 30, 2022, of which 30 (25.0%; enrolling a combined 2428 patients) failed to report their outcomes; 7 phase I trials (31.8%), 21 phase II trials (23.6%), and 2 phase III trials (22.2%) were unreported. Single-center studies were significantly more likely to be unreported than multicenter studies (19 of 54 [35.2%] vs 9 of 60 [15.0%]; P = .02). Of the 90 reported trials, 47 (52.2%) and 43 (47.8%) were positive and negative, respectively. Seventeen of 19 (89.5%) of the reported randomized trials (accruing a total of 4189 patients) were negative. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of immunotherapy breast cancer trials, the large number of trials yielded modest clinical impact. Single-center trials commonly failed to report their outcomes and many phase II studies have not translated into corresponding successful phase III trials.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicImmunotherapyCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID39028669
PMCPMC11259908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.